Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Well, there was the Spanish American war and the slogan, "Remember the Maine" that was used to promote it. Then there was the Balfour agreement that was the real reason the kikes began beating the war drums for WW I but real overt censorship began with Roosevelt against Father Coughlin and his outspoken criticism of Roosevelt's and the Jew's efforts to get us into WW II against the Germans. It's been downhill from there with the Jews now controlling all MSM. Only with the internet has any actual "news" been reported by some lone voices in the wilderness.

[–] • 2 pts

For anyone hear who hasn't heard Father Coughlin's based and red pilled speeches, give them a listen.

https://archive.org/details/Father_Coughlin

[–] • 1 pt

Remember the Maine is a great reference point. When the decision was made to get into WWI, those that objected were castigated, businesses damaged and destroyed, and propaganda turned up so no voice of objection could be heard. That, to me, is the beginning. Smedley Butler was a USMC hero, with 2 MoH, until he wrote "War is a Racket."

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

wealthy businessmen wanted to overthrow FDR in 1933, with Smedley as their puppet leader. I sometimes think maybe it would have been good if they did, they shouldn't have trusted him.

[–] • 0 pt

Remember: the people remembered Hoover, and had faith in Roosevelt. They believed in the gov't. Now we realize Roosevelt only acted because of labor union pressure, but then the only media was film, print, and radio.

[–] • 4 pts

I remember watching good journalists retiring or getting let go right around the time Walter Cronkite retired (1981). Nobody was sure if Cronkite was a Democrat or a Republican. That was the standard back them -- a television journalist tried to be so neutral that you couldn't tell what his personal politics were. I remember when television "journalists" began to have personal opinions, and to express them during "news" shows. I remember when the networks started to hire women with beautiful hair and long, shapely legs, which they would display under their tables. I remember the coming of the commentators, the cranks and nuts who had an ax to grind and were given a forum on news programs to grind it. We got that crazy freak from the movie Network on the evening news every night. But it all started to go south when we lost Walter Cronkite.

[–] • 2 pts

Cronkeit was a jew

[–] • 0 pt

In retrospect, it's not hard to recognize. At the time, he was very believable.

[–] • 1 pt

His name was Anglicized from the German/Yiddish 'Krankheit', which literally means 'sickness', lol

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

cronkite said he was "glad to sit at the right hand of Satan"

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I remember when journalists reported un-redacted news!

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] • 2 pts

>The MSM turned at the time of Nixon, and they were never the same since then. The shekels flowed hard into the MSM since then and they never been the same.

[–] • 2 pts

Right when basically jews were being mainstreamed. I mean I don't want to argue with the people that will say "always was" about their influence, particularly in the media, but the 60s is when they were sort of allowed into everything officially.

[–] • 0 pt

>They are not hiding their contempt of America anymore.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

The emasculation itself started way before, but I noticed it the day after 9/11 when Glenn Beck was crying and blubbering about making evil Afghanis pay for their crimes. I was still quite young then, but I felt instinctively that there was some bullshit being sold to me. Thus began my red-pilling.

[–] • 0 pt

when kikes started being allowed into our country

[–] • 0 pt

1800's, right around the time of the civil war.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Which civil war? This web site is accessed globally.

[–] • 0 pt

The US has only had one civil war, thus far. Egalitarianism was the craze among the elites globally around the 1700's through 1800's. There were efforts made to invest into people whose communities, clans, and families weren't, or unable to, invest into them. The elites sought to cultivate a citizen whose interests were better aligned with their own as their neighboring countries began to industrialize. They sought to industrialize their countries and produce better equipped/supported soldiers to defend the country's interests. You'll also notice the explosion in literacy around the European world at that time.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The US has only had one civil war, thus far.

What about us people that don't live in the USA?

[–] • 0 pt

The emasculation of the media is a built-in feature. It was expensive to buy a printing press, to maintain journalists, and later to maintain the international telegraph lines. Only very rich people could do that.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I would say they've always been emasculated, i.e. limited by what they thought the public would accept. In the Howard and early Rudd/Gillard years the media was always pro-nationalist since the public wouldn't tolerate wokeness at that time, then the woke element became emboldented as they started finding more butthurt recent migrants, who came in under Rudd, to run stories on. Since then they've been importing American wokeness and running with it as though it's somehow relevant here.