i would say that released images is the redundancy. I am not against multiple scanners, but the more friction you add to the process the more issues you have.
i just haven't seen a valid conversation about elections. they throw around buzz terms like blockchain, but they obviously havne't thought too hard about things (or have low understanding.
It’s not adding friction in a serial way but in a parallel way. If a vote counting party doesn’t show up with their scanner then “no big deal”.
All ballots to the net is almost all the redundancy we need, but it still implies only one authority is providing them.
saying that the voter has to scan multiple times adds friction
Ya kind of for the voter. All they have to do is go down a line feeding it into X scanners.
(post is archived)