Do you know of any other numbers besides 12 though? What a stupid argument.
No. That's the point. It's not a stupid argument, it's a stupid listener.
> Do you know of any other numbers besides 12 though? What a stupid argument.
No. **That's the point.** It's not a stupid argument, it's a stupid listener.
Yeah, must be. It's a weird cult you run here.
Yeah, must be. It's a weird cult you run here.
What's magic about 10 over 12?
What's magic about 10 over 12?
We do all our calculations base 10. Your argument is like the reasoning behind 360 degrees - ease of finding DIVISORS. That is such a weird, archaic requirement (like rationalizing denominators).
We do arithmetic in base 10. Yes, it is possible to use most any base, but you aren't going to change the entire world. I don't care if machine language uses binary or Gaussian integers; humans use base 10.
We do all our calculations base 10. Your argument is like the reasoning behind 360 degrees - ease of finding DIVISORS. That is such a weird, archaic requirement (like rationalizing denominators).
We do arithmetic in base 10. Yes, it is possible to use most any base, but you aren't going to change the entire world. I don't care if machine language uses binary or Gaussian integers; humans use base 10.
(post is archived)