WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

863

I guess at least with the senate we can stop them from approving judges? Theoretically, since we seemed to have no problem approving their cabinet, despite them holding up ours for like a year.

I guess at least with the senate we can stop them from approving judges? Theoretically, since we seemed to have no problem approving their cabinet, despite them holding up ours for like a year.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Will need a veto majority which obviously would be great but that’s quite the sleeper if we’ll get that.

We already have blocking power with the filibuster no?

[–] 1 pt

We already have blocking power with the filibuster no?

Not by any constitutional authority we don't... this is just a convention that can be changed with simple majority votes. If the Majority can just vote to take away the check-and-balance power of the Minority, then that check or balance was toothless to begin with.

[–] 0 pt

It is supposed to be votably removable or is that one the scam changes they made or just do anyways?