WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

514

For that would you go in the lem<<< named for jfk s gay lover. Would you go in that thing and let them create a vacuum?

For that would you go in the lem<<< named for jfk s gay lover. Would you go in that thing and let them create a vacuum?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

A pool has nothing to do with the vacuum, it has to do with buoyancy and simulating weightlessness. They wear the suits in a simulated weightless environment for training.

[–] 0 pt

So these suits can work under water pressure and in a vacuum while being flexible? Amazing what they could make in 1969

[–] 1 pt (edited )

You don't have to be in vacuum to prove it. You can prove it on earth by pressurizing the suit above atmospheric pressure. They don't pressurize them to 1 ATM in space, they do it lower and increase the oxygen so the partial pressure is the same.

Why do you think joints can't work? It isn't a balloon. It's seriously not the most complicated thing.

Dive down 30 feet in a diving pool. That's the difference in pressure from space to the bottom of the atmosphere. You can't wrap your head around engineering around that difference in pressure? I mean come the fuck on man.

[–] 0 pt

They don't pressurize them to 1 ATM in space, they do it lower and increase the oxygen so the partial pressure is the same.

Interesting, I did not know this.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah it was 1969 not 1869. We also fly aircraft from the 1950s (B52, U2), the SR71 flew in 1969, hell the V2 was built in the 40s. Why is a pressure suit amazing to you?

[–] 0 pt

Just think about it.. if your inside a vacuum and it was pressurized wouldn't you need the joints to be some how separated or a solid exoskeleton type suit? If you pressurized the entire suit wouldn't the legs and arms be stiff?

And why recently has nasa said it will take 4 years to devekope suits for a trip to the moon?