Who is "they?" Are we to expect the corrupt government people to shoot each other conveniently? Seems like they work in tandem.
Because their corrupt buddies have plenty of stooges who will lock America away and take over the narrative. Actually, they're additional charges for trying to assassinate a member of Congress because they're more important than Joe Six Pack shot for his groceries at the gas station.
Where do you get the idea that "they" can shoot anyone for any reason other than to stop an imminent threat of seriously bodily injury or death?
Corrupt CEO's? What does that even mean?
We've allowed the State to have the monopoly on violence.
A sign that you have a functional government is that it is wholly incentivised by its duty to the people, so it will actively seek out and hang corrupt officials and corporates.
Which interestingly has been the case with the Chinese State, executing people who oppose its interests. Albeit they see the 'State (body politic)' as being the embodiment of the 'People', so really these were crimes against the State by our standards.
What Biden is doing is colluding with corrupt officials and corporates AGAINST the people. It's the very antithesis of a functional government.
So yes, it's ideologically correct to shoot them (hello there FBI AI...). You can't have power over people if you are not putting their interests first, especially if you are erecting political systems to disenfranchise the 51% in the future.
There is no greater threat to your existence than allowing the enemy to retain political power over you, that's why niggers should not be allowed to vote (excluding issues of low IQ and greed)
Holy shit dude. We should at least put on a show trial first. Gotta do this, you know... all legit and stuff.
If we throw the maximum book at these people for the laws they've actually broken... and we give them no plea deals, no reduced sentences, no concurrent sentences, no kiddy camps, close all loopholes, etc... Perhaps through existing laws the corrupt may spend their remaining days behind bars in a supermax. That would be worse punishment than death in my opinion. I've never been much of a proponent of the death penalty; not because I care for the lives of criminals... it is because death would be sweet sweet relief from a life prison sentence. Death is no real punishment.
I've done far worse than kill you, Admiral. I've hurt you. And I wish to go on hurting you. I shall leave you as you left me, as you left her: marooned for all eternity in the center of a dead planet, buried alive. Buried alive. -KHHHHAAAAAAAANNNN!!!!
Please don't advocate violence here.
We denounce violence, that's not how we roll.
You inspired me. I'm going to start a petition. Everyone sign it and our problems will soon be over.
Indeed. We espouse only peaceful resistance. Look at how far it has gotten us so far: the government is owned by jews, the schools are full of marxism which will result in a generation of subservient communists, corporations do what they want to small business, liberals are free to riot and destroy cities as much as they want while the non-liberals get arrested and detained indefinitely for being let into the Capitol.
Yeah. Non-violence has been working out just spiffy so far, eh?
Shills advocate violence here to get the board shut down or to blame Trump supporters for future FF's. No thank you.
Shills advocate violence
so what are Antifa members doing on their boards, swapping vegan recipes?
outlining the idealogical basis for direct action is fine IMO, as are the theoretical tactics involved. because otherwise you just get dumb fucks shooting up schools/mosques and nothing is achieved.
The correct people need identifying and the reasons why they are anti White spelt out, nobody is suggesting 'OK next weekend we go do the thing', because everyone has to wait for their FBI handler to give the word and to distribute the gift vouchers...
No, we have the right to have (bear) weapons (arms) so that if needed we can form an organized militia that can then use force if necessary against a tyrannical government. This also extends individual use of force to oppose serious crime, a micro-tyranny as you would say in newspeek.
5th amendment also references charges brought by a militia and how they don't need to go before a grand jury.
Victorians are that fucking thick they havent bothered reading the laws which quite plainly state any victorian can arrest any other victorian, without a warrant, they cannot be charged with a crime in retaliation for the arrest, and any police officer attempting to interfere with the lawful arrest of a police officer, is committing perversion of justice which carries a 15 year jail sentence.
There is not a single government official in my state at the moment that anyone with more than 5 minutes in law enforcement couldnt lawfully arrest.
and corruption is..... what?
Corrupt politicians I understand.
But what is a corrupt CEO?
Idk the Pfizer CEO probably
The (((Sacklers))) come to mind
the same as a corrupt politician only running a private corporation instead of a public one?
With a corrupt politician, the expectation is that they would be looking out for the public good that they were elected to represent. Corruption is them taking bribes and selling out public interest for their own gain.
A CEO is hired to look out for the best interest of the corporation. I guess corruption would be them taking bribes and selling out the corporation's interests?
(post is archived)