Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

721

>I think Dr. Robert Malone and Rand Paul are both controlled opposition, and their role is to push a limited hangout, such as the "accidental" lab leak in Wuhan, China, which is total BS. Prove me wrong.....

What some are saying. I mean, when would they communicate, how do they get their stories straight? When do they have time? How could they fake their seeming passion?

Member when FBIanon questioned Alex Jones but said that Jones himself actually believes what he is saying.

Of course Q condemned Jones.

>>I think Dr. Robert Malone and Rand Paul are both controlled opposition, and their role is to push a limited hangout, such as the "accidental" lab leak in Wuhan, China, which is total BS. Prove me wrong..... What some are saying. I mean, when would they communicate, how do they get their stories straight? When do they have time? How could they fake their seeming passion? Member when FBIanon questioned Alex Jones but said that Jones himself actually believes what he is saying. Of course Q condemned Jones.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] [deleted] • 4 pts (edited )

There's no physical evidence of an intentional lab leak(weapon,) so, I'd guess they don't want to look like idiots by making bold claims without proof. Sticking to a possible accidental leak sticks with facts and doesn't stray too far into theory.

It's great to be bold, but better to be reliable. Malone sticks to facts so far as I've seen. Rand Paul, the same.

[–] • 3 pts

Yeah, that's exactly what I believe. Thanks.