Some think that Dr. Malone and Rand Paul are controlled opposition, to push a limited hangout, such as the so called accidental lab leak. Anybody wanna weigh in? Man this is confusing.

561

•

>I think Dr. Robert Malone and Rand Paul are both controlled opposition, and their role is to push a limited hangout, such as the "accidental" lab leak in Wuhan, China, which is total BS. Prove me wrong.....

What some are saying. I mean, when would they communicate, how do they get their stories straight? When do they have time? How could they fake their seeming passion?

Member when FBIanon questioned Alex Jones but said that Jones himself actually believes what he is saying.

Of course Q condemned Jones.

>>I think Dr. Robert Malone and Rand Paul are both controlled opposition, and their role is to push a limited hangout, such as the "accidental" lab leak in Wuhan, China, which is total BS. Prove me wrong..... What some are saying. I mean, when would they communicate, how do they get their stories straight? When do they have time? How could they fake their seeming passion? Member when FBIanon questioned Alex Jones but said that Jones himself actually believes what he is saying. Of course Q condemned Jones.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

(edited )

There's no physical evidence of an intentional lab leak(weapon,) so, I'd guess they don't want to look like idiots by making bold claims without proof. Sticking to a possible accidental leak sticks with facts and doesn't stray too far into theory.

It's great to be bold, but better to be reliable. Malone sticks to facts so far as I've seen. Rand Paul, the same.

link

[–] • 3 pts

Yeah, that's exactly what I believe. Thanks.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

I think people overestimate the puppet strings of the ruling class. It's much easier to make things look real by them being real. Rand Paul really thinks what he says. He's "controlled" in the sense that that guy is allowed to be a senator and people with more radical ideas aren't.