So in this particular instance I would suggest the name similarities were the result of some type of transplant rather than a random germanic traveling to the Levant and telling caananite mythology to his kids upon return.
You underestimate how much travelling and trade people did. The world was a very isolated place. People talked every opportunity they could.
Its estimated half of all untranslated texts were gossip and jokes.
It makes a lot of sense in the context: You live in a dangerous world where there is effectively no true law enforcement. If you're engaged in travelling, trade, commerce, or exploring, or even just going any sort of distance for work (woodcutting, fishing, hunting, trapping, mining)--if you're going any distance at all, the people 30-50 miles way from you could be completely foreign, if not in their ancestry, then in their attitudes and local dialect. Telling a joke goes a long way to diffusing tension and potential distrust of strangers. It would be an absolute survival advantage.
In my mind it proves the caananites made it as far as Scandinavia.
or vice-versa, but basically we agree.
Theres also credible accounts of middle easterners traveling as far as scotland and ireland, though I don't have links to that at the moment.
As far as them reaching Britain, there is really no doubt, though I know some still try to claim it didn't happen. I mean the tin for the bronze age had to come from somewhere. Pretty much certain the Greeks were up there also, since one of their early names "danites" is nearly identical to the danan of Ireland and one of them said they came from the other place (can't remember which). And both Dan's mean the same thing, a river.
Plus their predecessors the monolithic peoples clearly had boats since they built a hobbit city in the Orkneies. Seems strange to say they could make it there but not a group of ppl we know circumnavigated Africa around that time.
(post is archived)