Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

820

Must be/support:

  • 31.5" or 32"
  • Native resolution of 3840x2160
  • IPS or S-IPS or Nano-IPS
  • HDR
  • 10 bit per color channel
  • refresh rate lower than 5ms
  • P3 and/or 95%NTSC and/or 99%sRGB
  • DP and HDMI (USB-C not required)
  • Budget limited to $1000

This display is not gonna be used for gaming.

Must be/support: * 31.5" or 32" * Native resolution of 3840x2160 * IPS or S-IPS or Nano-IPS * HDR * 10 bit per color channel * refresh rate lower than 5ms * P3 and/or 95%NTSC and/or 99%sRGB * DP and HDMI (USB-C not required) * Budget limited to $1000 This display is not gonna be used for gaming.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

CRT

[–] • 1 pt

Whatever does 120-144hz refresh. Even just for running 10 terminal windows on a screen or writing documents I find the high refresh causes a lot less eye strain. I have not looked into 4k displays in a while and would love one for my productivity box but the price was crazy and the refresh rate was 60hz across the board. For sure get something 32'' and up for 4k with a nice gas strut monitor arm so you can flip it 90 degrees if needed.

[–] • 1 pt

I plan to buy 2 of them and get them setup SBS with a Vesa arm mount.

120hz and higher has no value with what I plan to use them for (3D modeling/animating, GFX Design and CAD).

Anything over 60hz on IPS panels is only valuable if you plan to do gaming, especially with tearing (freesync and gsync).

[–] • 1 pt

Wow, two of them, that is a lot of screen. For my old eyes I can notice the benefit of the higher refresh as far as eye strain goes now that I am used to it. It is kind of like the jump from flickering 15khz Amiga 1084 to a Sony trinitron back in the day. If it doesn't bother you than go with standard refresh.

[–] • 0 pt

Come over the chat, I'd like to discuss something with you.