WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Why do some people keep denying the great replacement? it seems strange that people keep denying it even though it's happening right before their eyes.

Why do some people keep denying the great replacement? it seems strange that people keep denying it even though it's happening right before their eyes.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Historically every fucker knew that people come in different kinds.

That is why every civilization that has survived has had a class/caste system.

Let that sink in. Every society that did not have a class system was short lived If they existed, then they left no historical record. And our little experiment looks like it's dying, and it will if we don't fix it.

See society as a body where the different parts of the body represent different kinds of people.

The head consists of the wise bear leaders who have political power.

The heart represents the church.

The feet and arms are the NPC/sheep who can do manual labor and will of course be treated well (!!) but they will have no political power.

It's not treating the bottom like shit, it's more about recognizing that people have different abilities.

[–] 3 pts

"Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom." - Alexis de Tocqueville

[–] 1 pt

Awesome quote!

[–] 1 pt

I haven't read Alexis de Tocqueville, maybe I should. That sound a little like socialism to me. I guess, at least in comparison to Europe USA was pretty high in equality at that time.

What write is probably unamerican, I am a Eurofag after all. Because USA didn't reallt have a class system, right?

Or actually you sort of did! Not everyone could vote. Also niggers were not fully classified as humans.

[–] 1 pt

Here, this is a good one...

“Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.”

― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

[–] 1 pt (edited )

America didn't have a hereditary nobility, and plenty were inclined to build one. The Senate was supposed to be like the House of Lords. Initially the states were free to nominate senators as they saw fit; they are now directly elected (can't remember exactly when that changed). There were people who wanted to make George Washington the new King. The fact that the founders held so many different ideas about how to run the new country was one of the reasons they came up with such a weak Federal government as existed from the American Revolution up until basically the (American) Civil War. There were only a few things they could all agree that the government should do, such as run the military and pay off the war debt.

Though nominally a continuous government since 1787(+/-), we aren't living under the same system as back then.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Because USA didn't reallt have a class system, right?

The main difference back then and for a while, between US and europe, was that there were no nobility in the US

But then you got "dynasties", a fancy word to describe intergenerational accumulation of wealth and political influence by some families see bush family

...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment

The Titles of Nobility Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution. The 11th Congress passed it on May 1, 1810, and submitted to the state legislatures for ratification. It would strip United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power." On two occasions between 1812 and 1816, it was within two states of the number needed to become part of the Constitution. Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, so the amendment is still pending before the states. Ratification by an additional 26 states is now needed for its adoption.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Actually I think he was a socialist.

Caste systems were well respected by the puritan and reformed theologians of the time, for several centuries, and they taught that you were to honor and respect those above you (not necessarily if they were evil of course) and it worked well for them, God made people different, and they taught that he was a God of order.

That's the wiliness of communists, they overturn order, like the french revolution and Russian. They are evil.

My quote might not have bolstered that position, at first glance I thought it did.

Sigh. Why is life so complex...

[–] 2 pts

Thank you for your comments. A lot of sheep will go with the flow as long as they're not affected personally. And you gave me something to think about.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks.

If you haven't read it already, or you read it a ver long time ago, I highly recommend Animal Farm, very pedagogic book just over 100 pages. Must read imho.

[–] 1 pt

I have to reread again with fresh eyes thank you for the suggestion

[–] 0 pt

"The poor you will have with you always" said Jesus Christ.

true, and of course common sense. It's because some are not able to do the simplest things to get ahead or cannot maintain self control to follow through with their responsibilities.