White people have the highest competence and therefore the least competition, so birth rates, genetically/biologically speaking don't need to be as high.
No. This is partially incorrect. Whites used to have big families.
The next release valve was bringing in foreigners who would be cool with being paid in a higher valued asset, which was a win/win because we needed more workers and they needed to feed their families.
Bringing in hordes of arab and nigger scum is never a win-win situation.
So, the more kids we have and the more "normal" they are, which is around 100 IQ
100 IQ is defined as the average.
Too many of you aren't blaming boomers and their retarded ass parents, who fucked us by offshoring and hippying their way in to massive regulations that never would've been complied with like the selfish assholes they are.
If you actually talk with boomers and their "retarded ass" parents you would find that they are endlessly more based than the millenial/post-millenial generations.
Each generation gets more based the farther back you go.
No. This is partially incorrect. Whites used to have big families.
Okay, but this just seems pedantic. I'm explaining the sociological, genetic and biological reasons they don't have as much competition and therefore don't need to have families as big. Mormons, even today, tend to have large families. Have you ever been to Utah? What about West Virginia? They have a similar thing going on, except they aren't necessarily Mormon.
Bringing in hordes of arab and nigger scum is never a win-win situation.
I can't tell if you just didn't read or you're getting overly emotional, causing you to pretend we disagree when we clearly don't. I said it was a win/win for the foreign workers and manufacturers who want cheaper labor.
100 IQ is defined as the average.
You're definitely just being pedantic.
If you actually talk with boomers and their "retarded ass" parents you would find that they are endlessly more based than the millenial/post-millenial generations.
Nope. Zoomers are all pretty hilarious and most of them really are based, even some of the women/teens. To answer your question, I've obviously talked to plenty of both and Zoomers tend to shrug where a Boomer would clutch their pearls.
Lot more Zoomed are based and there are a lot of good boomers out there too. But there is stupid and naive ones of both. Regardless of your generation I hope more people wake up to the truth of the great replacement the more the better.
I think the trouble is a lot of people in places like this shit on zooms because they've rarely had interaction with them. Purely digital exposure doesn't count as exposure, either. Any time you inject vanity, like you do with social media, which I'm guessing the people in question gather all of their exposure, you're going to have a deprecated takeaway compared to something organic.
(post is archived)