True. However, people often conflate tyranny with authority as is the case now. We clearly have tyranny now. Authority left the room decades ago. Further, we have no government. What passes for government is corporate feudalism. What we think of as politicians are mercenaries hired by these fascist corporations.
hired by these fascist corporations.
Oh bullshit. Corporations are owned by PEOPLE. Corporations have boards and shareholders. Those board seats and shareholder votes are owned by Blackrock, Vanguard, and other funds. Those funds are owned by the Rothschilds and other wealthy banking families. These wealthy banking families have NGOs and "Foundations" that their owned corporations donate money to in order to not pay taxes, which just redirects their wealth back to themselves tax free. Then these foundations donate to political campaigns, and launder money through groups of "members" to donate to political campaigns, in order to control all the important levers of government, and the governments' armies. Their media corporations and tech companies that they also owned are there to keep everyone distracted, divided, and complacent with whatever crazy, evil shit they want to do next, like depopulation and digital ID. They own the central banks that control our debt and money supply. They literally own and control everything behind layers of obfuscation like "corporations" "NGOs" and "Foundations".
It's the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Sacklers of the world. NOT corporations. Corporations are there to disguise who is really in control.
Right on. I simply didn't go deep enough. I do believe the rabbit hole goes even deeper.
Yes. That's what I'm getting at. The word "authority" carries the idea of moral or rightful obligation to obey. The decades-long conflation of authority with tyranny is to produce a generation of people who either feel morally obligated to obey tyrants or to fall into the trap of believing that force alone generates rightful authority.
Words have been coopted by the tyrants. I often struggle writing because words have multiple meanings. To make my point now requires writing a lot of words so the reader can understand the point. The paradox is writing too much prevents the people from reading it.
It should have simplified it by putting "just authority" in the title. But I have a hard time conceding the intentional shift in definitions.
(post is archived)