Why are you pretending that I think the actual distinction between just authority and tyranny changes what tyrants do? It obviously does not and reducing the discussion down to that is idiotic. The distinction between just authority and tyranny changes the moral or rightful obligation to obey. And I still believe it is important to maintain moral consistency. That was a large part of the Declaration of Independence; outlining the moral grounds for separating from the rule of a tyrant and justifying the use of force to back it up. Obviously tyrants will still tyrannize no matter how morally justified we are.
Two words: Punitive authority
If I can you're fucked, that's it, it's not open to debate
Tyrannical authority, what's the problem with that? None, it's a thing end of stupid debate https://www.dictionary.com/browse/despotism#:~:text=noun,an%20absolute%20or%20autocratic%20government. despotism noun the rule of a despot; the exercise of absolute authority. absolute power or control; tyranny. an absolute or autocratic government. a country ruled by a despot.
...
What is it you don't understand? Tyranny and authority aren't opposite or mutually exclusive, the end
Authority: The power to enforce rules or give orders
It's about power, it's all about power
You don't get that you get nothing
(post is archived)