Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why.

What do you niggerfaggots think?

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why. What do you niggerfaggots think?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

If they were born there, they vote there. Parents would probably vie to have their kids born in influential districts in swing States, but you can only game a system like that so far.

But allowing millions of Californians to move to places like Arizona and Colorado has fucked those places hard without lube.