Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

485

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why.

What do you niggerfaggots think?

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why. What do you niggerfaggots think?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 2 pts

Why 5? I picked 4 rather arbitrarily. How would you gauge the duration of the moratorium?

[–] • 1 pt

I suppose you could run some statistical reports on the distribution of years lived in a place by person, and cut it off at the lower 2 sigmas or something.

[–] • 1 pt

That would make sense. Completely cut out the people that are truly unmoored and just floating from place to place.