Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

619

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why.

What do you niggerfaggots think?

If I were the CEO of voting I would not allow men to vote in a new state until they had resided there for a period of several years (exact number up for debate but not to exceed 4). I think it's unacceptable for a person to be able to move to a new area and immediately have a voice in what the people who have lived there their whole lives are deciding to do. It takes time to really adjust to a new location and to understand how the people there choose to live and why. What do you niggerfaggots think?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

If I were CEO of voting then only private (not commercial or corporate) landowners, with an actual stake in the outcome of the election, get to vote. Each adult landowner gets one vote. Votes are hand counted with witnesses and video evidence.