> Nonsense and deflection. The flat earth theory which was theory based on flawed observation Dude, I genuinely don't mean this as an insult, but how is it possible to be this ignorant about the scientific process while seemingly being so interested at the same time? Your extensive lack of fundamentals is driving you in all kinds of wild directions. A theory is something that offers a causal explanation for a set of observed phenomena. "The Earth is flat" is an observation like "my shoe is black." Neither explains any previously unexplained phenomenon and neither provides tools to make predictions that can be measured and confirmed or denied. > And "crystallized iron" doesn't explain anything and the "solid core" seems like a goalpost shift away from liquid core. Which is it? It's both. Go and learn about the structure of the Earth's core so this conversation can evolve into one that's intelligent. You're basically asking me to teach you every step of the way while you resist even the most basic of information.