Densely packed urban centers are what produce liberals. We don't need more people who think that that sort of environment is healthy for a lifestyle. There's plenty of land all around to spread out, but you have to give up the notion that cities need to be coastal and built around public transportation. Wide open spaces with clear sky views and no gaudy modern architecture make for much clearer heads and happier hearts. Urbanites don't understand that because they are too busy trying to entertain themselves so they don't have to interact with other people when in reality interacting with other people is what would make them healthier and happier. Big cities drain you of your humanity and your soul. They're not worth losing your very being for.
I disagree. Cities are cultural centers and they are targeted aggressively by liberals. That's the only reason they produce more liberals. What happens in cities has a ton of influence and that's why they're preferred by people who want to spread cultural poison. I've had a front row seat to some of the events that get talked about here, and all over the world - it doesn't take a ton of people, the thing that gives it relevance is because cities are a focus for culture.
Hitler didn't come to power by spending time in a some remote Dorf, and from what I understand once he was in power the character of Weimar was no longer part of the urban German experience.
Don't get me wrong I love to spend lots of time in nature and agree it's healthier in general but the issue isn't that cities exist, it's the fact that the wrong forces are dominating them. They're an essential part of civilization and our heritage.
Cities should be centers of commerce and industry, not intended for habitation. Only the dregs should reside there.
What a silly thing to say.
Well put. I just moved from a major city to a much smaller city. Sadly one thing I’ve noticed in more rural America is the sad state of health people are in. The rural diet on average is terrible and the people are drug addicted and overweight. Certainly this exists in the city as well, but seems much more prevalent in more rural places. I love the country as much as I love the city, they are both necessary. The problem I see is the one where rural folks romanticize the country in the way the person you replied to did. And the city people who think they’re all superior in their big city pretensions. All the while they miss the point that the are both part of the same system, they are all the same people… which is why they are all fat.
Yeah I think both groups (Country mice and city mice) have trouble seeing things big picture. And it's such an easy copout to just blame a group you're not part of for problems.
That's human nature though and I know I do it too sometimes.
So far as I can determine, every major city in America is either under leftist-libtard dominion, or in the process of being taken over. If one accepts this as a given, what possible incentive would there be to create another one? “If you always do what you’ve always done, you always get what you’ve always gotten.”
I agree that making a new one is pointless. We need to learn how to take the existing ones back.
This is correct. Urban living causes a form of brain damage. Cities have always been dysgenic.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10190
Current city living was associated with increased amygdala activity, whereas urban upbringing affected the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, a key region for regulation of amygdala activity, negative affect9 and stress10. These findings were regionally and behaviourally specific, as no other brain structures were affected and no urbanicity effect was seen during control experiments invoking cognitive processing without stress.
Besides, walking is for faggots. I prefer to teleport everywhere.
MUH DIKK
(post is archived)