Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

773

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Paul McCartney died in a car crash in the 60s and the intelligence agencies worried that he was so famous his death would cause mass suicide/rioting amongst the youths so a double was found and trained to be the new Paul. The Beatles allude to this in several song lyrics and in the art work of their albums. In abby road they are shown to be walking across the road and paul is the only one with out shoes on, in sargent pepper i believe it avtually spells out pauls dead in flowers in the large collage area.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVtFOAnlPFM

[–] • 1 pt

People must not like me, when I say these things they throw shoes at me lol. But yeah, I'm convinced about it (PID).

[–] • 1 pt

I doubt their handlers cared that his death could cause suicide among the youth. They cared that their profits would diminish with the biggest draw of the group dead, simple as.

[–] • 3 pts

Tavistock.

[–] • 2 pts

I'll see your Tavistock and raise you a Theodor Adorno. Frankfurt School alum, Critical Theorist, Cultural Marxist, and all around douchebag that according to the magic bullet speeding and seeding thermite through the Paul Is Dead Kubrickian Moon Hoax Twin Towers like a Ryder Truck blowing out instead of in crowd, could pen some catchy ass tunes in his spare time. Ya know, to corrupt ze youth of ze decadent West.

[–] • 3 pts

It’s one of those conspiracies aimed at the retarded to delegitimize intelligent conspiracies simply by a general association to the concept of conspiracies. There are two Beatles conspiracy theories 1) Paul is Dead- like the Beatles or not they had a sense of humor and like that or not a lot of it was aimed at messing with their audience. They decided to make a light hearted effort at convincing their dumber or more drugged out following that Paul McCartney died in a car crash through a handful of little clues on a few of their records. Stupid people will point to the fact that older Paul looks a little different and sings a little different, failing to grasp the basic concept that people’s looks and voice change as they age. 2) Tavistock- apparently the genius of the Jews knows no bounds and that if they feel like it they can just take 4 guys who have some musical talent and turn them into the most successful and well loved band in modern history. All those songs that transcend generations are just the tv telling people to like them. The jews could write a bunch of catchy and inventive songs that make people feel things anytime they want but they don’t feel like it anymore. And the Jews also made the Beatles break up pretty much at their musical peak because they were so tired of having all this power over the goyim and they just wanted to give us a chance.

[–] • 2 pts

Every time I bring it up it's always "I don't give a rat's ass about the Beatles" you see, because these gen xers and millennials wanna show how cool they are because they hate all things boomer.so it blinds them to what Tavistock was doing in the way of SOCIAL ENGINEERING at the time, stuff they REALLY NEED TO KNOW so excuuuuuuuse me.

[–] • 3 pts

I don't give a rat's arse about the Beatles because they are globalistic trash, and I despise anything that is "popular culture" by virtue of it being an extension of the same. Do you think that anyone gets famous or becomes a celebrity without being an extension of that?

[–] • 0 pt

That's basically my point. It's important in that respect exactly, that it's part of the globalist communist plan and these groups are coached and used for the birthing and furthering of those plans.

[–] • 2 pts

I can't not like them because I think their music is garbage?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Of course. There's a lot to learn about how the elite manipulate through show biz.

Their music being garbage though is a far fetched claim, they did many types and doubtful they wrote a quarter of the stuff themselves. High quality much of it.

So I guess one would have to specifically state which genre or style of the Beatles was garbage cause they they did so much. I do believe it is 'cool' to hate the Beatles for many, a backlash against the boomers.

[–] • 2 pts

I've never met or seen online any gen xer or millennial who dislikes the Beatles. And I used to frequent music review sites.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't like their music because it always seemed to be following whatever was going to keep them popular. None of it feels genuine.

[–] • 1 pt

Kind of the same thing as "red pill" today only it applies to young brain dead boomers from the early 60's that fell for the Fab 4. Beatles Pill

[–] • 1 pt

Lol somebody just proved my point (see my comment), dang you self righteous young 'uns. Had it been we young dudes we would have done things SO different.

Aaaaargh. You feel me?

[–] • 0 pt

I was born in 1956

[–] • 0 pt

We'll pretend then, to make my point.

[–] • 1 pt

Never heard of it, but first thing that popped into my head was all 4 of em get nailed by a somali in a stolen truck running through the crosswalk on their album cover