So the hateful emotional anti Q people? Can we start a legit Q type movement? With stated goals but no trust plan?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (48).

[–] • 1 pt

I think this kind of assumption draws from not having a clear idea of what it is that Q was doing, what anons' roles were and why that didn't look differently than it did. Q was meant to relay information. That was the gist of the goal. What kind of information? It was classified information. See, with the way NDAs work and the system that governs confidentiality in the USA, there are certain things you can and can't say. Q's aim was to avoid legal repercussion and also convey information that would help autists from around the world decipher what the information meant so that they could arrive at the information Q was pointing to without Q divulging directly the innerworkings of intelligence operations, which would result in Q inevitably getting in trouble for having leaked classified information. The role of anons was to decipher this information, analyze it and disperse the information in a way that was appetizing and meaningful enough to point those willing to do their own research in the right direction. The reason it had to look so ambiguous and couldn't just be a list of what's wrong, how we can go about fixing it and how to prevent it again in the future is because of the confidential information structure that governs need to know information classifications. So Q used anons to craft that framework by supplying them with nebulous information that needed pieced back together.

Q essentially was a big Game. The idea was to be just succinct and obscure enough to get the interesting minds to commit, to then get them to speak with people around them and to in the end help people adjacent to those gifted enough to present the information to try to help more people understand what's wrong, how it can be fixed and why there can't be more direct involvement with people that have the ability to end the charade overnight.

The reason Q can't just snap their fingers and turn the problems off is because it wouldn't fix anything. People have to find the will to change on their own and then learning how to fix problems on their own means it might not happen again if they now understand the process of how to prevent getting back in to this scenario. This is the same reason why you teach men to fish instead of giving them fish.

I think this kind of assumption draws from not having a clear idea of what it is that Q was doing, what anons' roles were and why that didn't look differently than it did. Q was meant to relay information. That was the gist of the goal. What kind of information? It was classified information. See, with the way NDAs work and the system that governs confidentiality in the USA, there are certain things you can and can't say. Q's aim was to avoid legal repercussion and also convey information that would help autists from around the world decipher what the information meant so that they could arrive at the information Q was pointing to without Q divulging directly the innerworkings of intelligence operations, which would result in Q inevitably getting in trouble for having leaked classified information. The role of anons was to decipher this information, analyze it and disperse the information in a way that was appetizing and meaningful enough to point those willing to do their own research in the right direction. The reason it had to look so ambiguous and couldn't just be a list of what's wrong, how we can go about fixing it and how to prevent it again in the future is because of the confidential information structure that governs need to know information classifications. So Q used anons to craft that framework by supplying them with nebulous information that needed pieced back together. Q essentially was a big Game. The idea was to be just succinct and obscure enough to get the interesting minds to commit, to then get them to speak with people around them and to in the end help people adjacent to those gifted enough to present the information to try to help more people understand what's wrong, how it can be fixed and why there can't be more direct involvement with people that have the ability to end the charade overnight. The reason Q can't just snap their fingers and turn the problems off is because it wouldn't fix anything. People have to find the will to change on their own and then learning how to fix problems on their own means it might not happen again if they now understand the process of how to prevent getting back in to this scenario. This is the same reason why you teach men to fish instead of giving them fish.

parent
link