did Q actually accomplish anything?
No, he only posted over a three year span and woke up millions of people and brought them all together, no, Q didn't accomplish anything.
You could say the same thing about the original Matrix movie. 1984 and Brave New World woke up lots of people too, but nothing changed there either. Waking up people is as effective as raising awareness for breast cancer. It makes you feel like you're doing something good when in reality you're not doing anything at all while people continue to die from breast cancer. It made some people a lot of money, but never will there be a cure brought about by raising awareness.
Waking up people/raising awareness is just virtue signaling masturbation. You might feel good for a few seconds, but then you just have a mess you need to clean up.
If no one knows what's wrong, who's behind it or what our options are, how can we ever fix anything? You seem like you don't want more people to know about it. Your position is essentially, "why bother helping people learn if they won't do anything about it?"
I think you're demoralized and don't see why more people learning how to learn again is valuable. I think you're bothered that people aren't being dragged in to the streets and murdered. What does "cleaning up the mess" look like to you if this isn't what you're saying? I think all of us would love to hear a detailed plan to fix what we can all tell is broken. If you have a better plan, spit it out. Q and /ourguys/ already came up with one, but you're sitting here, on the sidelines, attempting to convince people that the plan they came up with or are participating in isn't helping. You're actually the first person any sane and organized movement would stuff in some cellar somewhere, because this kind of rhetoric is the exact thing that prevents more organized and genuine "resistance" to tyranny in any or all forms. You're actually doing more to harm forward progress than any of us not marching through the streets with rifles and demanding blood. This kind of sentiment is the exact thing that would get even more people killed and your confused and silly assertions that none of us are doing anything while you sit there and speak about how we should do something else while not offering an alternative (well, you are offering one, you just won't state it) route for us to take is accomplishing the very thing you're accusing all of us of.
No, not really, this was a real movement, the things you mention just aroused curiosity, of course, social media wasn't around then, so who knows.
>Waking up people is as effective as raising awareness for breast cancer. It makes you feel like you're doing something good when in reality you're not doing anything at all while people continue to die from breast cancer.
That's true, but the comparison is probably a bit weak with Q.
Waking people up ... it has to start somewhere.
but i mean didnt it keep making promises that never came true? "its gonna happen"
Yes, in that sense, but mostly Q posted info, people got the impression he was a prophet, Q was more of a 'forth-teller' than a 'foreteller.'
I think this kind of assumption draws from not having a clear idea of what it is that Q was doing, what anons' roles were and why that didn't look differently than it did. Q was meant to relay information. That was the gist of the goal. What kind of information? It was classified information. See, with the way NDAs work and the system that governs confidentiality in the USA, there are certain things you can and can't say. Q's aim was to avoid legal repercussion and also convey information that would help autists from around the world decipher what the information meant so that they could arrive at the information Q was pointing to without Q divulging directly the innerworkings of intelligence operations, which would result in Q inevitably getting in trouble for having leaked classified information. The role of anons was to decipher this information, analyze it and disperse the information in a way that was appetizing and meaningful enough to point those willing to do their own research in the right direction. The reason it had to look so ambiguous and couldn't just be a list of what's wrong, how we can go about fixing it and how to prevent it again in the future is because of the confidential information structure that governs need to know information classifications. So Q used anons to craft that framework by supplying them with nebulous information that needed pieced back together.
Q essentially was a big Game. The idea was to be just succinct and obscure enough to get the interesting minds to commit, to then get them to speak with people around them and to in the end help people adjacent to those gifted enough to present the information to try to help more people understand what's wrong, how it can be fixed and why there can't be more direct involvement with people that have the ability to end the charade overnight.
The reason Q can't just snap their fingers and turn the problems off is because it wouldn't fix anything. People have to find the will to change on their own and then learning how to fix problems on their own means it might not happen again if they now understand the process of how to prevent getting back in to this scenario. This is the same reason why you teach men to fish instead of giving them fish.
(post is archived)