Man I need to repost my title was bad.
What I was getting at is I'd like a designation for vets that were in the shit saw front line combat etc... I just had multiple bad experience with vets getting free shit bragging about it and they never did shit.
>So if people who served in the military got injured and developed a disability while in should not get benefits?
If you got hurt from your activities in the millitary hell yes they should get paid. The two people I knew got hurt out side of the millitary and somehow got100% disability...
I knew a parajumper who's knees and back where fucked! He absolutely deserved every thing he got the other two are losers that should be sued and have to return their money
>I agree!
I just had multiple bad experience with vets getting free shit bragging about it and they never did shit.
Some people are just loudmouth braggarts. Even if they were on the frontlines or were never in the army you'd still have reason to hate them because they'd just be bragging about some other bullshit.
As for paper-pushers, a war is won through supporting roles. Doesn't matter how fortified or badass your frontlines are, if they're not supported logistically they will collapse. There's a reason that when you look at wars from the 1600's it's like "King Jeff, 3 of his buddies and 27 peasants, vs King Pierre, 5 of his buddies, 9 peasants and14 mercenaries"
I recall a figure during the Bush administration that it cost approximately $750,000 to train a single soldier and deploy them to Afghanistan. Assuming only 1/3 of that is staffing costs, that's $250,000 worth of time and effort paper-pushers spend to get that soldier to Afghanistan.
(post is archived)