WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

212

From a national testing company.

Editable so I can use it every week.

I plan to tell them: I WILL NOT COMPLY. I will answer no vaccination questions.

Reason: I am an American Patriot and my ancestors fought in the revolutionary War unlike all these interlopers that came after.

I will provide you a slip of paper every week and that's that.

Now, from poal, I need a PDF.

THANKS YOU LUNATICS LETS GIVE EM HELL! MERRY CHRISTMAS!

From a national testing company. Editable so I can use it every week. I plan to tell them: I WILL NOT COMPLY. I will answer no vaccination questions. Reason: I am an American Patriot and my ancestors fought in the revolutionary War unlike all these interlopers that came after. I will provide you a slip of paper every week and that's that. Now, from poal, I need a PDF. THANKS YOU LUNATICS LETS GIVE EM HELL! MERRY CHRISTMAS!

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Medical test results are private healthcare records. Your employer is not your care provider and therefore does not have authority to view your records without your consent. Tell them your test results are for you and your primary care provider's viewing only and that you do not consent to disclose your medical status with a party who is not part of your personal healthcare services. When they balk at this, ask them if have enough liability insurance coverage to pay out a huge settlement for violating HIPAA laws as a unauthorized, non-healthcare provider to you. They may say they can request a (((vaxx))) card without violating HIPAA, which is largely true, but a (((jewflu))) test result is a medical record and fully protected by HIPPA. Tell them to ask their attorneys about this and what it would mean for them if they go against your consent.

[–] 2 pts

Don't listen to this faggot. Hippa has nothing to do with this. Hippa just relates to institutions disclosing records without your consent or knowledge. Don't take legal advice from people on the internet and this is exactly why.

[–] 1 pt

Law is basically that they can make employment contingent on you disclosing what's pertinent to the safety of coworkers and customers.

As to what that means, who knows but since there seems to be photos of Roberts having sex with children or something, doesn't seem like the scotus will help.