lol, WOW! you don't take well to criticism I see....
Clearly you are just a stupid emotional nigger after all.
Ta'ta, faggot.
It's not about criticism. It's about the fact that everything you said has nothing to do with the topic or you're are completely wrong. Again, had you actually watched the videos you would already know this. But you're offering objective bullshit to things you haven't even watched and obviously know absolutely nothing about. Meanwhile you continue to talk out your ass.
lots of assumption coming from you....
I did watch your videos which is why I thanked you for sharing them with me. But the basic realities of the geography in the Adrar Plateau where the Richoet circles appear is not even disputed in your videos. That rock exists in a type of Shield strata that is made up of Precambrian crystalline igneous and metamorphic rocks and not a Basin deposit of sedimentary rock that would be reflective of water during that period 15,000-10,000 years ago. The timeline does not add up which is why that theory remains up for discussion.
If you can account for why there are no sedimentary deposits that corelate on that timeframe and how isostatic elevation changes of over 1500 meters happened so quickly I am happy to hear it but neither of those videos could answer it and there is no example anywhere else of such rapid changes occurring making the likelihood of such an event extremely small.
Either way, its a fun though experiment but the hard geomorphology data is not there to support it.
If you can account for why there are no sedimentary deposits that corelate on
There's is little research on the area which is strange you make the claims you do. Smells. Additionally, flow is documented and the directions match. Sand.
You keep going on about tectonic movement which is completely irrelevant. Literally insane you would even mention it. It's stupid. You should research crust displacement from impacts. Which also aligns.
Basically, as I said, every "issue" you raise is completely irrelevant and not an issue in any way. Additionally, your objections continue to confirm you know nothing of the topic yet you continue to insist your irrelevant "knowledge" is applicable. It's not.
If you want to ignore it because you know things which don't matter, obviously that is your choice. But stop pushing bullshit and expect it to be treated as reasonable discourse. Which is, after all, entirely why you are rebuffed accordingly.
Summary: this exceeds normal standards of evidence as is customary for archeological consideration. The only things contrary you offer are irrelevant or bullshit. All while you insist people learn more bullshit.
I encourage you to learn more. And stop pushing bullshit as if it's credible.
(post is archived)