That guy does a good job of summarizing the Richot Circles but he fails to mention any dates.
My understanding of the geology at Rechot and the timeline of that geological feature is that Isostatic movement of the land mass of West Africa occurred on a time table of around a million years not 10,000-15,000 years making the correlation unlikely.
Cool, videos though. Thanks for sharing them with me.
Roughly 11,800 years ago, which precisely aligns. Cataclysm was roughly 12,000 years ago. Which also correlates to various stellar alignment and geologic wear on things like the pyramids and other lost civilizations of roughly 13,000 years.
In a nutshell, this is an amazingly strong correlation. Significant archeological conjecture is established upon much weaker positions.
Yes, but the actual geological science and tectonic movement of the African plate do not corelate with these dates at all. Significant isostatic movement in the African Plate on its Western edge is a Divergent Boundary instead of a Convergent Boundary that would be associated with "uplift". Equally, the Geologic Province and origin of the landmass of West Africa is well documented from core sampling done by mining companies. We know that the Adrar Plateau of the Sahara dessert is made up of exposed Precambrian crystalline igneous and metamorphic rocks that are only found in tectonically stable areas geographically known as Shield. There is a Basin in the region but again the timing of those significant sedimentary deposits are scaled out to millions of years.
I like the idea of the eye of Africa theory, but I could never get the timeline to work out.
I'd say you have a lot of research to go. There is a huge amount of evidence which aligns with these time tables and dates. You imagining otherwise doesn't change the facts.
(post is archived)