Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

312

Is anyone still defending this faggot bot? Sure it's a free speech thing, but spam and self-promotion posts are too and no one seems to like those. What's Tealc trying to hide from us today?

Is anyone still defending this faggot bot? Sure it's a free speech thing, but spam and self-promotion posts are too and no one seems to like those. What's Tealc trying to hide from us today?

(post is archived)

[–] • 15 pts

Block the user.

[–] • 27 pts

That's like ignoring jews or niggers. Nothing good happens when you ignore them because they keep on jewing and nigging.

[–] • 9 pts

That is a bad comparison. In the real world ignoring Jews and Niggers will see you screwed financially or being robbed/raped/killed.

The faggot posts here don't have these real world consequences. If everyone ignores them, (or blocks them so they are not seen) then whoever is posting them is either wasting their time or wasting resources to run a bot doing work that will accomplish nothing. Encouraging everyone to just block them ourselves is better than shadow banning because the bot operator might wonder if they have been shadow banned and create another account to see if the bot posts are visible. They will see that they are and realize that they are just being ignored.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

If it's one thing you can count on, it's people blindly upvoting everything or vote manipulation through sock accounts. One of my concerns is sending a friend or relative here on a bad day when some faggot is posting porn or worse, and because of the blind upvoting/vote manipulation it winds up on the front page. Then I get accused of sending someone to a porn site. This ALMOST happened once before... luckily the guy never actually bothered to come here.

[–] • 7 pts

Ignore the Jew behind the curtain!!!

[–] • 5 pts

But it's the only tool you have here. Use it.

[–] • 12 pts

That will only be effective if we all do it. Also, just like on Voat, (((Tealc))) will just make a new account and you'll be playing whack-a-mole with the problem.

[–] • 5 pts

Not true. The other tool is to create posts bringing awareness so users can downvote forum sliding content.

[–] • 2 pts

Except at best 5% will, which makes their bullshit 95% effective.

"Just block them" is a retarded libertarian idea. Individual solutions don't work for conniving/devious attacks against a population that take those individual solutions into account.

[–] • 1 pt

If a jew nags in the forest, but you can't hear it...?

[–] • 6 pts

...he still subverts White society.

With jews you lose.

[–] • 6 pts

can't yet

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt

I think you need to be a certain rank to block. I don't have that ability yet either. And I really want to block Tealc.

tagging you as well if this might be of use to you.

[–] • 14 pts

Demand your Poal subscription fee back.

[–] • 5 pts

What happens to all the money I spent on Poal Gold accounts?

[–] • 1 pt

You'll just have to wait until you have enough of those sweet sweet upvotes to cash in and break even.

[–] • 7 pts

And what do you suggest we do? The need for real public forums that are not censored trumps your minor inconvenience. I would love to hear any real suggestions about how to combat any of the Cointellpro strategies that do not infringe on civil rights... but you are basically just advocating for censorship. Who get to decide? Who monitors the censors? What are the protections against abuse? etc...

Block the user if you want to not see the content.

[–] • 10 pts

I'm not calling for censorship. Nothing I said included a call for censorship. I'm instead asking Poal if they still think this shit is harmless and funny. A lot of Poalrs seem to think that this is just some novelty account having fun and it's not affecting Poal. I've seen this sort of behavior adversely affect other forums so it's not harmless fun. Did you think TheAmerican/GhostSkin/BigTrucker/My10thAccount/99887766 posts on Voat were also harmless fun? That guy was subverting the forum and poisoning the content. He glowed like a motherfucker. Think about that in the case of Tealc.

[–] • 3 pts

Is it the 'indeed' title that bothers you specifically or the velocity of posts?

[–] • 4 pts

It's bot-like behavior. Would it be acceptable if it were posting porn or (((vaxx))) shilling memes? There's no human content or commentary behind the account so it might as well be treated as spam. You ever try to have a conversation or discussion with Tealc? All it replies with is 'indeed'. That's worthless. Funny how people around here hate AI generated content but accept a bot-like account that has less to offer than AI generated content.

[–] • 2 pts

No, I get your point... but I think you missed mine. I welcome suggestions on how we combat all of the cointellpro tactics, but I refuse to sacrifice the free speech high ground.

If you have constructive suggestions then make your suggestion. Otherwise your post is just whiny bitching.

[–] • 9 pts

My suggestion will probably get called 'censorship', but perhaps a new site rule that doesn't allow the same one word post title or comment to be used over and over in a short period of time could at least make the low effort trolls have to put in some effort. But aside from that, other users need to stop upvoting this shit and definitely stop defending it as harmless content. People would be more upset if these were posts for selling dick enlargement pills and would call for the user to be banned. Why is this so different? It's a crafted attack designed to have people defend it because of 'free speech'. (((They))) will use your sensibilities against you any chance you give them. This is why it's dangerous.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Suggestion - put time cap on creating new topics - only one new topic per every, 12 mins and 46 seconds. (example)

if using bots here is illegal, this proccedure could make it easier to root out the bots that start posting more precisely. Nothing says bot, like a whole mess of pre-timed posts. Make the bots adapt, then learn what their adaption was. Then close that.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Wait, how do you block someone? i don't see any block button on the user's page

[–] • 2 pts

I think you need to be a certain rank to block. I don't have that ability yet either. And I really want to block Tealc.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

"rank" to block someone?

wtf

[–] • 3 pts

Make a rule:

1) don't do retarded shit like post the same subject over and over or get banned

Then enforce it.

That's not censorship, it's preventing obvious attacks. There's a difference.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

He doesn’t post the same subject over and over. He posts different memes of different types in different subs. Morbo’s only complaint is that the title is always indeed. I think Morbo’s just angry that someone found a way to get upvotes faster than him without putting any real creativity into it.

But in reality, I’ve never seen the vast majority of the memes posted by , I welcome them. I don’t upvote them, but I like to see them

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

As said:

It's bot-like behavior. Would it be acceptable if it were posting porn or (((vaxx))) shilling memes? There's no human content or commentary behind the account so it might as well be treated as spam. You ever try to have a conversation or discussion with Tealc? All it replies with is 'indeed'. That's worthless. Funny how people around here hate AI generated content but accept a bot-like account that has less to offer than AI generated content.

So no, Morbo is not just saying he doesn't like indeed or that hes jealous. He has legitimate points and this is clearly a bot. Defending a bot should get you the greedy merchant tag.

[–] • 4 pts

What is the definition of "spam"? I fail to see how posting the same single word again and again isn't spam. Isnt there already have a rule against exactly this behaviour?

[–] • 4 pts

posting the same single word again and again

Is a form of spamming.

[–] • 0 pt

Same title =/= same content. Hell 90% of the titles on memes are useless anyway; who really fucking cares

[–] • 4 pts

I don't have a problem with Tealc's posts. Most of them are stuff I've seen before, but I could say that about a lot of user's posts. Just because he likes his 'Indeed' shtick he should have action taken against him?

I agree with stupidbird, just block him if it bothers you.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

I finally found the indeed posts in the liberals sub. I personally don't see the big deal. Maybe the people complaining are having issues with the statements / pointing out the hypocrisy they make obvious? They certainly aren't lies. I see the badged ones complain the most, could be a correlation, who am I to say...

[–] • 4 pts

It’s spam and people won’t downvote it and censoring kikes is forbidden here so nothing to do about it

[–] • 4 pts

Dear fellow white people, forum sliding is good and should always be allowed, also open borders are good for everyone (but Israel, to suggest so is antisemitic) and also make sure your daughters produce mongrels. That is all

[–] • 0 pt

I really envy your Golden Turd of Zion

[–] • 1 pt

I really envy your Golden Turd of Zion

As an anus expander, I would think you would feel an affinity for anything that passed out of (or into) the rectum.

Checks out…

[–] • 0 pt

My great affinity is for things that go in and out, in and out, in and out..

[–] • 4 pts

I fucking hate it.

Please for the love of God ban them or at least give them a special icon and grey them out.

It's 100% forum sliding and also search poisoning. Fucking banhammer already.

[–] • 1 pt

Search poisoning. Because you always search for posts using only the word “indeed”

[–] • 2 pts

I automatically downvote, but is there anything else I can do to posts that do absolutely nothing positive for the board?

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, block the user on his page

[–] • 2 pts

The faggot owns an indeed sub. Why aren't all those posts just redirected to that faggots own sub? Hello

[–] • 1 pt

Pretty much all of his posts are in subs that he owns

[–] • 1 pt

Which makes him the biggest faggot of them all.

[–] • 1 pt

Or the biggest rule follower

[–] • 2 pts

He's not a bot or trying to hide anything. He has a weird sense of humor, though.

Load more (27 replies)