Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

555

Poal has a ban on “calls to violence”.

If a revolution were to occur, certainly a number of people would need to be arrested. To enforce such lawful arrests, a show (and perhaps use) of force might be required.

But if the arrests would be performed under what people would consider lawful circumstances, would calling for such arrests - even planning for them - be “calls to violence”?

Poal has a ban on “calls to violence”. If a revolution were to occur, certainly a number of people would need to be arrested. To enforce such lawful arrests, a show (and perhaps use) of force might be required. But if the arrests would be performed under what people would consider lawful circumstances, would calling for such arrests - even planning for them - be “calls to violence”?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 0 pt

No. Violence is force carried out in order to cause damage or injury. An arrest requires the use of force, and should not devolve into violence in normal situations.

[–] • 1 pt

Placing someone under complete detention and custody against their will isn't an act of violence.

Can we please get an IQ test of at least 23 to post on poal?