Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Poal has a ban on “calls to violence”.

If a revolution were to occur, certainly a number of people would need to be arrested. To enforce such lawful arrests, a show (and perhaps use) of force might be required.

But if the arrests would be performed under what people would consider lawful circumstances, would calling for such arrests - even planning for them - be “calls to violence”?

Poal has a ban on “calls to violence”. If a revolution were to occur, certainly a number of people would need to be arrested. To enforce such lawful arrests, a show (and perhaps use) of force might be required. But if the arrests would be performed under what people would consider lawful circumstances, would calling for such arrests - even planning for them - be “calls to violence”?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 1 pt

Asking the questions certainly isn’t. Would a call for a dog who has harmed to be locked up a call to violence?

[–] • 2 pts

According to lots of dog owners, yes. Like said, it's not about our own perception of lawful or violence, it's self-preservation against how the powers that be will interpret it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a call to violence if it's morally and lawfully backed.

[–] • 0 pt

I’m not getting into the politics of it. I understand the self preservation aspect. Just answering the question!