I wrote that it is not possible to prove that God exist
You're wrong. It is. I don't know how many times I have to say St. Thomas proved it in 5 ways. Here's the cliff notes:
https://files.catbox.moe/iktc9z.jpg
St. Thomas (; ) and after him many scholastic writers advance the five following arguments to prove the existence of God:
- Motion, i.e. the passing from power to act, as it takes place in the universe implies a first unmoved Mover (primum movens immobile), who is God; else we should postulate an infinite series of movers, which is inconceivable.
- For the same reason efficient causes, as we see them operating in this world, imply the existence of a First Cause that is uncaused, i.e. that possesses in itself the sufficient reason for its existence; and this is God.
- The fact that contingent beings exist, i.e. beings whose non-existence is recognized as possible, implies the existence of a necessary being, who is God.
- The graduated perfections of being actually existing in the universe can be understood only by comparison with an absolute standard that is also actual, i.e., an infinitely perfect Being such as God.
- The wonderful order or evidence of intelligent design which the universe exhibits implies the existence of a supramundane Designer, who is no other than God Himself.
You can go to the sources if you prefer. They're cited above with links. You should read them.
>I wrote that it is not possible to prove that God exist
You're wrong. It is. I don't know how many times I have to say St. Thomas proved it in 5 ways. Here's the cliff notes:
https://files.catbox.moe/iktc9z.jpg
St. Thomas ([Summa Theologica I:2:3](https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1002.htm); [Cont. Gent., I, xiii](https://isidore.co/aquinas/ContraGentiles1.htm#13)) and after him many scholastic writers advance the five following arguments to prove the existence of God:
- Motion, i.e. the passing from power to act, as it takes place in the universe implies a first unmoved Mover (primum movens immobile), who is God; else we should postulate an infinite series of movers, which is inconceivable.
- For the same reason efficient causes, as we see them operating in this world, imply the existence of a First Cause that is uncaused, i.e. that possesses in itself the sufficient reason for its existence; and this is God.
- The fact that contingent beings exist, i.e. beings whose non-existence is recognized as possible, implies the existence of a necessary being, who is God.
- The graduated perfections of being actually existing in the universe can be understood only by comparison with an absolute standard that is also actual, i.e., an infinitely perfect Being such as God.
- The wonderful order or evidence of intelligent design which the universe exhibits implies the existence of a supramundane Designer, who is no other than God Himself.
You can go to the sources if you prefer. They're cited above with links. You should read them.
Whatever, have a nice day
We may meet in the aftherlife and maybe, then, we will argue about the proof that God exist
In the meantine, have a nice time
P.S. If you wish, a more useful activity (for the time being) is convincing the sheep that jabbing is not beneficial for your health
Whatever, have a nice day
We may meet in the aftherlife and maybe, then, we will argue about the proof that God exist
In the meantine, have a nice time
P.S. If you wish, a more useful activity (for the time being) is convincing the sheep that jabbing is not beneficial for your health
(post is archived)