Jordan Peterson refuses to answer question about 'JQ' & Solzhenitsyn's 'Two Hundred Years Together'
That's all you need to know about controlled opposition.
Damn, that was weird. What a faggot.
I could excuse this if he's talked about it elsewhere, in more of a private setting, or something, but I've not seen that.
Mel Gibson gives more than Peterson.
Mel's best way to describe them, ironically, by using their own lies:
Oven dodgers
Didn't know he said that exactly, I knew of other things.
Some of you are too old to remember Robert Mitchum.
That's why I suspect the guy, yes. I remember either reading about it or hearing about it.
Will watch the clip, appreciate it.
Same thing with Jared Taylor:
"jews are fine by me...[they] look white to me." - Jared Taylor when asked about the jews
The only way to know if they are controlled opposition is to ask them about the JQ.
Oh yeah, Jared Taylor. I used to have hope in that guy. These Hollywood celebs, some, say more truth.
This on the other hand is a good example of controlled opposition. At best it could be ignorance but highly doubtful in this case
Controlled opposition is one possibility. Knowing your audience is another.
Addressing the JQ is one of many tasks we have in this war. Arguably the most important one, but if JP is reaching a large audience around ideas that push back other areas of leftism and leaving this task to others then he's still an asset and an ally.
Note he didn't dispute any of the question, he expressed nonverbally this is difficult, gave himself the bare minimum of plausable deniability on the topic, and simply said "I can't" He was actually very careful not to openly discredit the asker.
He's allowed to leave that part of the fight to others. I feel like he's pulling his weight.
stretching
lol Name checks out.
Whatever. Either way we need to be a little more willing to use people to our advantage even if they don't check every single box as someone who should be in charge.
And yeah my username sucks but if I get a new account then I have to wait forever before I can block engrishishard again so not worth it.
This seems like an opportunistic measure to paint JP as a jewish-apologist when, in reality, answering the question empirically would dismantle his reach to the wider audience of young men, who desperately yearn for guidance and moralism. This kind of anchoring technique, being used by you and others like you, to attach "JP is a jewish-apologist" to any mention of his name, undermines that very work. This is a super disappointing thing to see from you, man. I understand that it rubs you the wrong way, being anonymous, that someone who's in a position to do so won't consider risking their reach to the demoralized and destitute masses who desperately need his assistance in untangling the caustic and fickle position of men, that Jordan wouldn't go there. But this looks much more like Jordan practicing tact or prudence than it does, "he's obviously controlled opposition."
It still puzzles me that you get a great deal right, but you can't spot the pragmatic route Jordan takes.
but you can't spot the pragmatic route Jordan takes.
I know exactly who he is and what his purpose is about.
Go check out who he's married to and how he's been struggling with depression and addiction.
Psychiatrists have one of the highest suicide rates of all professions. I'm fully aware of what his family looks like. To go a little /x/ on you, energy, in either polar end, has influence upon those in proximity. When one absorbs so much negative energy, like a trauma surgeon or a psychiatrist, that tends to build up. This guy has been at it for decades. Calling him an addict has long been used to discredit his work to moralize young men. There were even rumors for a while, which I still subscribe to, that he was poisoned. I think what you're doing is attacking the messenger. His network effect ought to be defended. It sucks that you can only see the trees and not the forest. He does a great deal to help young men in a time when demoralization is rampant and it sucks to see you also suffering from demoralization.
I think you're smarter than this.
(post is archived)