Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

280

I was reading about Stephen King giving his book rights away for free to people willing to make movies. Why would he do this, if they can make money from his books?

I was reading about Stephen King giving his book rights away for free to people willing to make movies. Why would he do this, if they can make money from his books?

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

Kings books are full of subversive propaganda.

It's either how he got published by the ds or he is a member of the ds

[–] • 5 pts

His books frequent pedophilia.

[–] • 5 pts

I'll never forget the pre-teen gangbang. I read that when I was a preteen, IIRC. I had trouble understanding what was actually happening. As an adult, I know precisely what happened in that scene- a young girl (who is raped by her father regularly) allows like 7 of her friends to fuck her in the sewers in order to... defeat a monster that King ripped off from HP Lovecraft.

HP Lovecraft didn't write about child fucking, as far as I know. Tangent... poor HP Lovecraft. The man's fame came after his death. His legendary status would never benefit him in life. Meanwhile, faggots like King rake in millions using ideas they got from better writers.

[–] • 0 pt

Sadly, once you begin to see you can't unsee.

[–] • 0 pt

Knew Stephen was a pedo coke head fuckup when I read that garbage.

When I heard they were making a movie I was like, "There's no FUCKING WAY."

Of course they took all that shit out of the screenplay.. But nobody addressed that fucking elephant in the room.

[–] • 1 pt

Superior blacks.

Almost all villains are Whyte.

Right wing and conservatives are the devil.

Usa historically was evil

[–] • 4 pts

He was a drunk and then a junky. He lived in near isolation. He’s a pervert. Definitely a liberal. I don’t think he has the intellectual horsepower that he did before he began abusing substances.

Books don’t pull in the cash like they used to, and he’s not cranking them out like he did in the old days. Most don’t read anymore, but they will carve out the time to watch a movie. Maybe it’s a back end deal. Free book rights, but if you make a movie with it, King gets a cut.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 2 pts

ITT: Donald Trump is living rent-free in King's head.

[–] • 1 pt

Maybe his getting run over wasn’t an accident after all

[–] • 0 pt

You can buy the rights to his short stories for $1 to make into a movie

[–] • 0 pt

Shitlib for sure. The term ‘Communist’ is rather played out now and is as bland and gay as ‘nazi’. If I hear someone bitching about another person being a nazi or fascist I can comfortably assume they are a retard… Same with communist.

[–] • 0 pt

Never read his books, but the decent movies I can count on one hand...Carrie, Cujo, and Misery.....parts of Silver Bullet and Cat's Eye.

[–] • 0 pt

Most likely.

He's also a HACK AUTHOR who fucked up his brain doing a shit ton of cocaine.

The ignorant, stupid, and self-retarded just love communism.

[–] • 0 pt

He’s a pedo. Kubrick warned us in 1980 with The Shining.

[–] • 0 pt

Can you elaborate on this?

[–] • 1 pt

The main character, Jack, was openly admitted by King to be an avatar of himself and his own “battle with addiction.” Kubrick’s version of the story features clear themes that Jack both physically and sexually abused Danny which were not present in the novel. Kubrick made King’s avatar a pedo because he knew King was a pedo.

[–] • 1 pt

Kubrick’s version of the story features clear themes that Jack both physically and sexually abused Danny which were not present in the novel.

I've always been baffled that people don't catch this. Maybe it's because, having read the book, I see the tremendous differences.

The "Shining" in the book is essentially psychic powers.... but in the film, it appears to be a mark of someone who was sexually abused. Little Danny and the old nigger have this in common. Old magic negro seems to identify that Danny is being abused by his father, and tries to comfort him and eventually attempts a rescue.

Then there's the far more subtle shit in the movie- in the very first scene we see of Jack, waiting in the lobby for his job interview, he's reading a PlayGirl magazine. Not Playboy. He's literally looking at gay porn. And then it's repeatedly implied that he did something to Danny. When Danny has his encounter with the "old woman ghost", it's more likely that he was imagining this- he was dissociating himself during the abuse. The scene right before this ends with Jack sitting creepily next to Danny on a bed, stroking him and telling him how much he loves him.

And then Danny walks, dazed and beaten up, into the room with his mother. She all but flat out says "You fucked our son again?!" when she confronts Jack over Danny's injuries.

Kubrick was a jew. But he seemed... like he was a sort of outlier. I believe "Eyes Wide Shut" was a sort of.... documentary. And is it a coincidence that he dies not long after EWS? Maybe, he was a fat addict getting older, so maybe it was a natural death... But with everything that came to light with Podesta (who seems to be completely fucking forgotten for some reason) and Epstein, the events in EWS don't seem as far-fetched.

[–] • 0 pt

I'll have to go back and watch it. Thanks.