Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

340
  1. Changes all the prices to 100x, so a single case of beer will be $900-1800.
  2. Give every customer a spin on the wheel, to see what their discount is!
  3. 99% chance to spin 99% off. If someone happens to get unlucky, just have them spin again.

So the thieves would be limited to stealing 1/100th, or risk felony.

There's probably something obvious that I'm missing.

1. Changes all the prices to 100x, so a single case of beer will be $900-1800. 2. Give every customer a spin on the wheel, to see what their discount is! 3. 99% chance to spin 99% off. If someone happens to get unlucky, just have them spin again. So the thieves would be limited to stealing 1/100th, or risk felony. There's probably something obvious that I'm missing.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (72).
[–] • 15 pts

There's probably something obvious that I'm missing.

Yes. The idiots who created the situation are still going to be in charge. They'd most certainly go after any shop keeper who tried something like that. As would the complicit media.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Fair enough. They'd probably break a record to quickly change the law.

[–] • 9 pts

Philadelphia banned bullet proof glass because rayccissm, and NJ banned bullet vests. The criminals in charge will keep changing the rules as they go

[–] • 2 pts

This was the result of Prop 47.

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_47,_Reduced_Penalties_for_Some_Crimes_Initiative_(2014)

The blame lies with the 60% of California voters that voted for it.

[–] • 2 pts

Was this a mail in vote by chance?

[–] • 1 pt

It was in 2014.

[–] • 0 pt

60% of California voters

I.e., beaners and niggers

[–] • 1 pt

Not even them. Only 4 million voted for it. That's barely more than 10% of Californians.

[–] • 1 pt

They'd get them for price gouging or some other kike bullshit