Isn't that where he committed the crime?
Isn't that where he committed the crime?
No. At . That's why he was convicted in Los Angeles.
in March 1977 Polanski, who was then 43, took a child, Samantha Gailey (now Geimer), who he knew was 13 years old, to Jack Nicholson’s house to take photos of her for a magazine. There, he gave her champagne and, according to her, quaaludes. He then had sex with her, drove her home and, the next day, was arrested.
No. At [Jack Nicholson's house](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jan/30/hollywood-reverence-child-rapist-roman-polanski-convicted-40-years-on-run). That's why he was convicted in Los Angeles.
> in March 1977 Polanski, who was then 43, took a child, Samantha Gailey (now Geimer), who he knew was 13 years old, to Jack Nicholson’s house to take photos of her for a magazine. There, he gave her champagne and, according to her, quaaludes. He then had sex with her, drove her home and, the next day, was arrested.
The tiny jew manlet with the big schnozz apparently couldn't impress legal-aged women. But Samantha's mother set up the foto shoot, and left them alone in a hotel.
The tiny jew manlet with the big schnozz apparently couldn't impress legal-aged women. But Samantha's mother set up the foto shoot, and left them alone in a hotel.
(post is archived)