Can some one explain with science how they suppodly know that people with covid1984 who are vaccinated get less sick?

[–] • 11 pts

Because they fake the stats back to before the vaccines were out and then claim the unvaccinated get hospitalized and die more often.

Then the people only see a headline and they all repeat it like a cult and you can’t tell them otherwise, even if their friends/family/coworkers get hospitalized and die while double vaxxed with boosters.

link

[–] • 3 pts

If you die within 30 days of a murder shot it doesn't get counted as a vaccine injury regardless. If you get COVID within 14 days of receiving murder shots they don't count the infection as "infected despite murder shot".

COVID is a statistics-created disease and nothing else.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I see this claim all over the place. What is the source? Is it on the CDC website or some government site I can show people when they ask about this claim?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I'm pretty sure its on the CDC site. But I don't have the energy to look it up right now as I'm recovering from COVID I got from a 3-Pfizered friend.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

cult here is the important word. it is a religion, the covid is the belief, the vaccine is the savior, the unvaxxed the heretics. the pass shows how a good follower you are. you have the appostels talking about their saviors on tv. its seriously crazy how people crave religion. in this godless world thry have replaced god by a virus and are brainwashing people.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Also those double shorted an be classified as unvaccinated. Why? Because upon first being shot you are more likely to get a serious case of covid so they grant a three week hiatus before being considered vaccined

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

You have to tell them this to get them to take the vaxx.

link

[–] • 2 pts

They don't know this. Plus, they never factor in treatments such as Ivermectin.

link

[–] • 2 pts

The claim is that the shots modify your immune system to produce more antibodies which target corona viruses, which would include covid19 and like 200+ other viruses.

However, it appears to be temporary. The only good, peer reviewed study I read about this "increase in efficiency" showed something like 55% increase in antibodies in the 20-30 age group.... but it showed a ~30% decrease in the senior citizen age groups. By this data, the shots actually make older folks more susceptible and weak to corona viruses.

This study also indicates a potential new form of "AIDS" that could be caused by the shot; each week, the antibody production decreases around 5-10% for the 20-30 age group. After a few months, they are actually producing fewer antibodies than before they got the shot. This is why they "need" boosters- which are far less effective, only giving a ~30% increase to the 20-30 age group.

If the trend continues in this manner, the shot people (I won't call them "vaccinated", because they're not) will eventually end up producing half or less corona virus antibodies. This is how AIDS kills- production of antibodies for something like, say, the common cold drops so low, that the virus absolutely thrives and crushes the person, causing it to develop into viral pneumonia and eventually kill them.

How could they even prove this with any scientific method?

Without having isolated the covid19 virus itself yet, they... they really can't. Remember, corona virus is an umbrella term which applies to a family, a "breed" of viruses with a range of effects and danger levels. Some of these viruses are quite literally harmless, but some will kill a healthy young man. But until you actually ISOLATE the specific virus, you can't really measure effectiveness of antibodies at destroying the virus.

I can show you a picture of HIV under a microscope. I can show you a photo of many, many viruses which have been isolated, identified, and even used to create actual vaccines (I won't get into whether or not vaccines in general are bullshit)... but even after 2 fucking years, even though this virus is held in a fucking lab... they don't have it isolated? How? They have vials of it in Wuhan. The last 2 years, hundreds of billions, perhaps trillions of dollars went into figuring out this covid19 thing... and they still haven't fucking isolated it? HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?!

So until they isolate, they can't say with any certainty that "Oh this guy got a viral load of [insert viral load size], let's see how fast [insert drug] can stop viral replication and lead to recovery." or "This shot person's bloodwork indicates they got a pretty large viral load, but they are recovering significantly faster than a patient with similar health/sex/underlying conditions who does not have the shot... this indicates that the shot is helping." They're just fucking guessing. And the "medical establishment" will never admit this, because it reveals the terrifying truth about doctors- most of them are useless fuck-wits, glorified search engines with the ability to write prescriptions and order tests.

Never forget that the 3rd leading cause of death in the USA is medical malpractice. I would wager that it's actually number 1, at least since this covid bullshit began. When my mother got "covid", her doctor wouldn't even prescribe her cough medicine- wanted her to get monoclonal antibodies. Refused to even try prescribing Ivermectin, HCQ, or anything at all to even treat the symptoms! They wanted my mother to suffer to the point where she felt she had to be hospitalized.... this is where they would have murdered her and made hundreds of thousands of dollars from the federal government/her insurance.

The claim is that the shots modify your immune system to produce *more* antibodies which target corona viruses, which would include covid19 and like 200+ other viruses. However, it appears to be temporary. The only good, peer reviewed study I read about this "increase in efficiency" showed something like 55% increase in antibodies in the 20-30 age group.... but it showed a ~30% *decrease* in the senior citizen age groups. By this data, the shots actually make older folks *more* susceptible and weak to corona viruses. This study also indicates a potential new form of "AIDS" that could be caused by the shot; each week, the antibody production decreases around 5-10% for the 20-30 age group. After a few months, **they are actually producing fewer antibodies than before they got the shot.** This is why they "need" boosters- which are far less effective, only giving a ~30% increase to the 20-30 age group. If the trend continues in this manner, the shot people (I won't call them "vaccinated", because they're not) will eventually end up producing half or less corona virus antibodies. This is how AIDS kills- production of antibodies for something like, say, the common cold drops so low, that the virus absolutely thrives and crushes the person, causing it to develop into viral pneumonia and eventually kill them. >How could they even prove this with any scientific method? Without having isolated the covid19 virus itself yet, they... they really can't. Remember, corona virus is an umbrella term which applies to a family, a "breed" of viruses with a range of effects and danger levels. Some of these viruses are quite literally harmless, but some will kill a healthy young man. **But until you actually ISOLATE the specific virus, you can't really measure effectiveness of antibodies at destroying the virus.** I can show you a picture of HIV under a microscope. I can show you a photo of many, many viruses which have been isolated, identified, and even used to create *actual vaccines* (I won't get into whether or not vaccines in general are bullshit)... but even after 2 fucking years, even though this virus is held in a fucking lab... they don't have it isolated? How? They have vials of it in Wuhan. The last 2 years, hundreds of billions, perhaps trillions of dollars went into figuring out this covid19 thing... and they *still* haven't fucking isolated it? **HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?!** So until they isolate, they can't say with any certainty that "Oh this guy got a viral load of [insert viral load size], let's see how fast [insert drug] can stop viral replication and lead to recovery." or "This shot person's bloodwork indicates they got a pretty large viral load, but they are recovering significantly faster than a patient with similar health/sex/underlying conditions who does *not* have the shot... this indicates that the shot is helping." They're just fucking guessing. And the "medical establishment" will never admit this, because it reveals the terrifying truth about doctors- most of them are useless fuck-wits, glorified search engines with the ability to write prescriptions and order tests. Never forget that the 3rd leading cause of death in the USA is medical malpractice. I would wager that it's actually number 1, at least since this covid bullshit began. When my mother got "covid", her doctor wouldn't even prescribe her cough medicine- wanted her to get monoclonal antibodies. Refused to even try prescribing Ivermectin, HCQ, or *anything at all* to even treat the symptoms! They wanted my mother to suffer to the point where she felt she had to be hospitalized.... this is where they would have murdered her and made hundreds of thousands of dollars from the federal government/her insurance.

link

[–] • 0 pt

Was it not the case for HIV that it was also not isolated? I was under the impression that, HIV was almost the blueprint for all this shenanigans.

What i don't understand is how they are detecting these "variants" or claiming they are more mutated than other versions. How do they go about stating that?

I presume someone tests negative with a pcr test but the doctor says, they clearly have covid symptoms, so they then take samples and do their bullshit version of "isolation" and then compare whatever comes out of that with what the previous genomic sequence is that they have recorded for the original cv-19? Is that how it works?

Unless they are looking at it through a microscope though how the fuck can they say it has more mutations? Are they basing that on the number of different genetic changes compared to the original "isolate"?

I am aware the whole process is shady as fuck but they are obviously basing what they say on something they can atleast somewhat prove, even if it is using their own lies, but i still dont understand that process, any idea?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

My mom said if they tried to ventilate her I was to go and get her out of the hospital. I probably would have ended up in jail or killed a bunch of people at the hospital getting her out