It's simple but not necessarily easy time and patience is the key here. A small explanation is necessary here. Q, despite being a psyop, or turned into one, mainly scared an element of the regime because they feared they'd either lose control or someone else would seize control of the groupmind narrative going on with it. They never seriously risked losing control, but the regime is always paranoid. I've of course not offered any evidence here, only supposition, because anything without evidence is really just a shitpost, and I'm just here to engage in the grapevine anyway. Regardless, actual links and documentation are important because if they can follow a GCH(Q) rabbit hole to find patterns, they can connect dots in more solid information given to them. So do that. What worked for me to shift attitudes was focusing on explaining the various actors motives and incentives more than anything. Take the format of investigative tv shows, that break down, motive, means, and opportunity. Anyone 30 and over has seen one of those and is familiar with the pattern, themes, and psychoengineering of those shows. They are effective because the way they are designed is to have a rewarding pay off at the end. Q works because it follows dot connecting, with no real pay off. So if you give them something real, and you give them enough over a few conversations to start making their *own* simple predictions, they'll very quickly change tracks. I did this. I seen it. It actually works. And it works fairly quickly. 3-5 conversations is what it should take. So maybe 1-2 a week. And because they're in the habit *already* of sharing information and connecting, they will then go on to 'convert' others to this new pattern, piggybacking on the topic of Q as a common introduction point. The people I helped connect the political dots for? They've now gone on to do the same for others. Its a chain that keeps going, hopefully forever.