WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

731

J. K. Rowling is a libtard, but she claims to be straight and against trasfaggots. This make the woke SJW be against her. Recently she even had death threats. Hollywood kike owned celebs are trying to cancel her. Is she a genuine old school white liberal fighting against degeneracy, or is she just another fake celebrity controlled by kikes?

J. K. Rowling is a libtard, but she claims to be straight and against trasfaggots. This make the woke SJW be against her. Recently she even had death threats. Hollywood kike owned celebs are trying to cancel her. Is she a genuine old school white liberal fighting against degeneracy, or is she just another fake celebrity controlled by kikes?

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

She is simply what happens when a femicunt holds true to her feminist values in the face of progressives as keen to destroy feminity as they were to abuse female pride for the feminist movement

[–] 2 pts

An important insight I had a while ago is that the modern feminist movement has always been about destroying women.

[–] 0 pt

> modern feminist movement

[–] 2 pts

Something everyone seems to forget is that liberals are incompatible with themselves.blacks beat and rape women, trannies distort and undermine femininity, immigrants run drugs that destroy black communities, Islam wants the entire left executed and probably agree more with the right and just use the left solely to oppose the right that resists them.

[–] 0 pt

Trannies can't 'distort and undermine' femininity, because femininity has distorted and undermined by feminism much earlier that there's nothing left already.

[–] 1 pt

Just because feminists distort femininity doesnt mean nobody else can. Everybody knows what femininity is, even if they cant define it. Jews have assaulted it from every avenue available for millenia. Feminism though is effectively transgenderism, Women can do everything men can do === women are men. Bullshit ideology.

[–] 5 pts

JK Rowling had no problem pandering to the woke crowd and bastardizing her own work to please them before, making Dumbledore a fag or implying Hermione could be black despite evidence of the contrary.

She's a genuine SELL OUT who made a blunder with the troon comment. Were she any other middling author she would have backed out immediately and made Harry a genderfluid troon as an apology, but she has fuck you money so she gets to double down on it while pretending to fight a moral crusade that doesn't harm her networth in any meaningful way, otherwise you'd see her down on her knees begging twitter to forgive her.

[–] 0 pt

Eh, I think she's sincere, she didn't care about race or sexuality so didn't care if Ron was a gaynigger from outterspace or whatever. That wasn't her hill to die on because she is still a libtard that believes in dumb shit like good gays and black crime denial. she just doesn't like trans because they are fucking horrific and dangerous to women. No woman likes men in 'womanface', they are just bullied into accepting them 'or else'

[–] 0 pt

I'd be willing to bet that numerous quislings in Rowling's publishing companies, and her agent, have come to her on their knees, begging her to recant and repent. It is some credit to her that she has refused.

[–] 1 pt

It's not enough for the liberal fascists that you be liberal, and agree with most of what they say ... you have to agree with everything they say, or your are excommunicado.

"the chocolate ration has been increased from 30 grams to 20! Big Brother is generous!"

[–] 1 pt

Rowling has “fuck you” money. She isn’t an ideologue. She’s basically somebody who went into stasis as an individual once she crossed a certain financial threshold.

Right now, she’s pissed that people call her names, so she is fighting back, and doesn’t give a shit.

She made Dumbledore a fag for whatever reason she saw fit, so it isn’t as though she has a problem with faggotry at large. She’s just angry at the way the troons are treating her. For now.

She’d respond similarly to conservative Christians if they made personal attacks against her.

[–] 1 pt

She is proof that the slippery slope is real.

she's needs just a little push and she'll be pilled sufficiently to open her lefty eyes- ever so reluctantly. Being super wealthy nothing touches her; she can have unpopular opinions and not be phased by negative social media.

[–] 1 pt

She wrote Harry Potter I believe

yeah with a bunch of plagirism from Tolkein and CS Lewis, Dante...Milton...etc. etc...

[–] 0 pt

Imitation is the highest form of flattery

[–] 0 pt (edited )
[–] 0 pt (edited )

A feminist against trannies, that's all. It's like a jewish banker against mexican illegal immigrants or something. The former is so much bigger problem than the latter, it's not even close.

A feminist is by definition an epitome of degeneracy, it never can be a genuine old school liberal or whatnot.

She is a mediocre author and I disagree with her on many of her political viewpoints, but people that I know in publishing say that she is extremely nice, genuinely religious and I do admire that she made something of herself and for her family instead of continuing on the government dime. I don’t particularly care for her politics but good for her for sticking up for herself.

I don’t have to agree with someone on everything in order to find something to admire about them.

She knew how to make a successful foray into publishing, her original manuscript was formulaic and a little bit trite but it was formulaic because she knew what buttons to push and wanted to sell the damn thing.

Good for her. I have no major beef with her. She treats the people around her very well, she has some redeeming qualities, I can’t hate her.

[–] 0 pt

The trans community is currently "punching down" on Rowling's family. Harassment. Death threats. Stalking. Etc.

[–] 0 pt

Her book sales are sucking ass, and she ran out of rabbi's to give blowjobs too.

Load more (3 replies)