WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

506

The truth is its about 1% of the population is committing 50% of the murders.. maybe 2% I'm not sure. It's black males between 12 and 30 that are doing the majority of the murders? I think. Any one got a better guess?

When u think of it that way it truly is insane

The truth is its about 1% of the population is committing 50% of the murders.. maybe 2% I'm not sure. It's black males between 12 and 30 that are doing the majority of the murders? I think. Any one got a better guess? When u think of it that way it truly is insane

(post is archived)

That just becomes a question of how narrowly you group peopple. Murderers commit 100% of the murders.

[–] 2 pts

right, but if toggling one attribute (race) moves the output more than others then you need to consider it.

I'm guessing that this could be applied to things like "HS graduate B-average" would have a similar effect. The main thing is that they use "gun crime" as a political tool to attack "white people, with long guns, who aren't leftists", when the truth is that it is black/brown golumn in cities (leftist voting) that are where the stat comes from.

[–] 0 pt

But that's not a correlation that imparts predictive information. A correlation between two or more variables gives predictive power.