Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

576

I've had some old links, not to papers, where it said that pregnant woman should not get the jab however those links have died.

I'm hoping you guys have actual papers about the implications for woman who are pregnant or wanting to get pregnant.

There was one such paper which one of the authors has now rebuked his findings (probably got offered a large sum of dollars)

The publication posted here (see link in first tweet): https://archive.ph/VA1nE

Paper withdrawn: https://archive.fo/MeHwY

Kthx.

I've had some old links, not to papers, where it said that pregnant woman should not get the jab however those links have died. I'm hoping you guys have actual papers about the implications for woman who are pregnant or wanting to get pregnant. There was one such paper which one of the authors has now rebuked his findings (probably got offered a large sum of dollars) The publication posted here (see link in first tweet): https://archive.ph/VA1nE Paper withdrawn: https://archive.fo/MeHwY Kthx.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 1 pt

It's bad. That's what the research will detail.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah I know it's bad. But people will use the "science" if it says that it's good. Hense the WHO or CDC flipping their stance on it initially saying it's bad but now saying it's okay, go get it.

[–] • 1 pt

I would take the approach of "we're under attack" by the (((media))) and (((big pharma))). There are so many lies about Wuhan virus and the graphene spike protein gene editing shot, people will believe what they hear from (((big media))).

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah mate, I'm well aware we are under attack.

I got the Mrs learning more and more about it and how the government is literally destroying or country and killing our people, which has shaken her a bit but she has now found a few friends who are getting redpilled and they keep sending each other drabs of information.