Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

284

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling.

Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling. Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] • 1 pt

Totally a marxist/alenski thing. Same thing was done with "pride"; what are they actually proud of, dick in poo?

They did it with the rainbow as well, where they had to reach really hard to even come up with 6 degenerate things. It actually really is a pain because we can't even buy things for kids anymore with rainbows because they are 6 color degenerate crap.

They did it with "diversity", "gender", "equality", "vaccine", and so on. manipulating language manipulates minds, and they have full control of the institutions.

[–] • 1 pt

Pride is just the opposite of shame. Up until that point, homosexuals were told to be ashamed of their sin. Pride is flaunting it, sort of like belonging to the Church of Satan is flaunting one's heresy.

[–] • 1 pt

at a logical level they should feel shame because they are living unproductive lives that do not help expand their people by choice. They have absolutely nothing to be proud of (from being gay) unless it is that they are proud that they have anal sex with an average of a thousand partners.

I see what you are saying, but it should be "It's okay to be gay" instead of "be proud to be gay". BUT this would not manipulate people the way (((they))) need to.

[–] • 2 pts

For sure, it's all about normalizing and encouraging deviant behavior. Traditional societies shun homosexuality for many reasons; it's not arbitrary bias. (((They))) want to break down traditional society.