WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

953

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling.

Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling. Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It's an unfortunate abuse of the English language. The word "gay" has a long history of meaning light-hearted, cheerful and carefree. It's a tragedy to see it degraded by some artificial connection with homosexuality. I could say the same about "faggot" but that's not a word that had great currency in English, so not such a big loss. "Queer" once meant odd or strange. We haven't quite lost that one -- you can still use the word "queer" in this context and be understood by readers.