WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

594

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling.

Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

We used to have a word for excessively to the point of being emotionally off 'happy'. Now we don't have a word for that anymore, it just means homosexual. I don't see any reason to not have this word anymore, seems like a good word. What's ironic is you can't be 'overly happy' anymore without people thinking you're homosexual. Seems that this usurping was actually the beginning of 1984 double think style controlling. Wouldn't you think people being 'overly happy' to the point of not making sense, might be good for a healthy society with cohesiveness?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I think it was the Seventies.

[–] 2 pts

I was always under the impression it was the

[–] 1 pt

It's the only use of the word that way that I could find before the 1970's.

It's an odd outlier.

[–] 0 pt

Maybe it just wasn't used much publicly. Way back in that era there was a lot of things that weren't allowed to be said or shown in motion pictures and later, tv. It really loosened up in the '70's.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Gay is used by Judeo-Marxist communists to define taking in the ass as political ideology. Some faggots are against being politicized and identify themselves just as homosexuals.

[–] 1 pt

1982 is when the "gay" tookover from "queer".

That was also the year that Evil took over from very very good men.

[–] 3 pts

I think this shows us the intent. It was probably less about ruining the word gay and more about taking baby steps to make faggotry sound more positive. In other words changing the implication from "these people are strange" to "doing this makes these people really happy"

[–] 1 pt

You nailed it. Since 1982 America has been involved in a huge psyop.

Pure evil is real, and is being eradicated.

[–] 0 pt

and is being eradicated.

We watching the same game?

[–] 0 pt

i totally believe you, but why did you pick 1982? i would have said something like around ww1 or something when power (institutional power) started going to satanists.

[–] 1 pt

Personal experience.

That's when good men were replaced with those hellbent on their agendas, not God's.

Tomorrow, that all changes.

[–] 0 pt

It's tomorrow, what has changed?

[–] 1 pt

Well we allowed the word Gay to be used in place of homosexuals. We never took a stand and took the word back.

[–] 1 pt

Totally a marxist/alenski thing. Same thing was done with "pride"; what are they actually proud of, dick in poo?

They did it with the rainbow as well, where they had to reach really hard to even come up with 6 degenerate things. It actually really is a pain because we can't even buy things for kids anymore with rainbows because they are 6 color degenerate crap.

They did it with "diversity", "gender", "equality", "vaccine", and so on. manipulating language manipulates minds, and they have full control of the institutions.

[–] 1 pt

Pride is just the opposite of shame. Up until that point, homosexuals were told to be ashamed of their sin. Pride is flaunting it, sort of like belonging to the Church of Satan is flaunting one's heresy.

[–] 1 pt

at a logical level they should feel shame because they are living unproductive lives that do not help expand their people by choice. They have absolutely nothing to be proud of (from being gay) unless it is that they are proud that they have anal sex with an average of a thousand partners.

I see what you are saying, but it should be "It's okay to be gay" instead of "be proud to be gay". BUT this would not manipulate people the way (((they))) need to.

[–] 2 pts

For sure, it's all about normalizing and encouraging deviant behavior. Traditional societies shun homosexuality for many reasons; it's not arbitrary bias. (((They))) want to break down traditional society.

[–] 1 pt

So the pr firm that was hired to do it was hired in the 1970's.

[–] 0 pt

I have said this for a while. I also wonder how they stole the word gay. I personally refuse to let them steal words. I still use the term gay and queer as it was originated. Ignorant people are often confused.

[–] 0 pt

Most likely a white person trying to be nice by using the term "gay" as opposed to "sick, disgusting, sexual deviant, pedophile, pervert, faggot".

I would think.

[–] 0 pt

It's an unfortunate abuse of the English language. The word "gay" has a long history of meaning light-hearted, cheerful and carefree. It's a tragedy to see it degraded by some artificial connection with homosexuality. I could say the same about "faggot" but that's not a word that had great currency in English, so not such a big loss. "Queer" once meant odd or strange. We haven't quite lost that one -- you can still use the word "queer" in this context and be understood by readers.

Load more (6 replies)