WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

824

Or something in a similar vein of "forget saving the ship, just grab some popcorn and crypto while enjoying the clown show"?

Or something in a similar vein of "forget saving the ship, just grab some popcorn and crypto while enjoying the clown show"?

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Accelerationism... where the cabal wins sooner.

[–] 0 pt

Accelerationism... where the cabal loses because it can't manage the pace of change, and they lose control of national sentiment.

[–] 0 pt

Sorry, they prefer the acceleration and have a plan.

The acceleration your looking for would require taking out people in key power positions, which the citizenry clearly refuses to do.

AI can easily manage the pace of change and that is what large corporations are using to make decisions with.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Accelerationism is just never a good idea

However in the game of hearts, there is a play in the game where if you play to lose at the maximum level, if you pull it off you end up obliterating ALL of your opponents.

I believe there is a play for accelerationism along that idea.

[–] 3 pts

The game may be rigged, but it's the only game in town. Shooting the moon in hearts is a great analogy. 200 years ago accelerationism would have been a terrible plan, but these days it sounds better and better given the "be half enslaved forever" alternative.

The only solution is for you to make one.

[–] 4 pts

One might even say it’s “the final solution.”

[–] 1 pt

is focused on surviving the collapse and rebuilding after.

[–] 0 pt

I did a quick search and didn't see one.

Accelerationism may ultimately backfire on the Nat Soc/White nationalists. They may very well provoke civil wars in certain Western countries due to looming gun bans, but the Christian Right and other civnat right-wing factions might end up seeing them as a threat to achieving international recognition and legitimacy, and this will lead to infighting. But then again, I think it really depends on who exactly the Nat Soc/WN types end up targeting to advance their accelerationist agenda, if they do so at all.

[–] 2 pts

I'm not a collectivist. I simply recognize that society has spent my entire life hating me while taxing over half my productive labor. That leaves me in a position where maintaining the status quo is unappealing, while letting the whole rotten system collapse has a reasonable chance of leaving myself and other competent individuals in a position to dictate terms when we have guns, food, power, and crypto...and the moochers and looters are starving because they think "diversity" and "feels" will keep the power on.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

There is a whole world for that.