Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

973

Do (((they))) want it to happen this way?

Pretty obvious that the paid antifaggots are ready on standby for aftermath.

Another thought I've had is that someone will at least attempt to kill Kyle once he is found not guilty.

God forbid...

Do (((they))) want it to happen this way? Pretty obvious that the paid antifaggots are ready on standby for aftermath. Another thought I've had is that someone will at least attempt to kill Kyle once he is found not guilty. God forbid...

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

Mostly it's just a weak case. All they have is "Rittenhouse acquired a rifle through a legal gray area, three criminals tried to murder him, and he shot them in self defense on video from multiple angles, then ran straight to the police to surrender". Prosecuting a homicide case based upon that is essentially impossible without looking incompetent because it's such a weak case. Mens rea? Good luck with that, because people with a guilty mind dont run up to the police and try to turn themselves in. Pre-meditation? Who would "pre-meditate" being pursued through the streets by a howlig mob that outnumbers you 100-1 and only firing after being repeatedly cornered? That's ridiculous. Negligence? In hindsight, carrying a weapon on a night when three separate people tried to murder you is IQ 200 level prescience not negligence. Accident? Pointig a gun at someone who attacks you clearly isn't accidental.

All the prosecution has is "you acquired a self-defense tool through a legal gray area and saved your life by using it". It'd be akin to trying to prosecute a police officer for murder because they parked too far from the curb when responding to an active shooter call. Technically you have to park within X feet of the curb, but technically officers can lawfully ignore traffic statutes when responding to calls, so do you really want to argue a murder case over a murky slap on the wrist citation at most?

[–] • 5 pts

My theory is that Kyle will be exonerated. This gives the plebs faith in a crumbling system.

[–] • 0 pt

Any good production has ups and downs. They're going to let us have 2022, and maybe even 2024 to keep the drama going. They're going to let it swing towards the Republicans for a bit because they don't care about that. Israel will still get money, American children will still die in the Middle East for Israel's wars, there will still be laws against naming the jew.

If you thought the deep state and media flipped their shit over Trump, just watch what happens if you ever see anyone with a power level above 0 ever gain any prominence.

[–] • 0 pt

100% this we are watching a movie a show so to speak.. the title would be the slow genocide of whites... or white western civilization destroyed by jews and women.

The longer they can stay in power and perfect their MEEPAC MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT EDUCATION PORN ADVERTISING COMPLEX the brain washing machine and they can perfect some type of tech to suppress the masses the jews will openly take control I'd say when whites are small enough minority they can't stop the kikes. When? How long till it's over? Probably already is it went on hyper drive in 1965 the immigration act was the final straw and put in place by a kike

[–] • 4 pts

It's not intentional, it's just incompetence. Also, antifaggots won't come out in the winter in Wisconsin, so there won't be riots.

[–] • 2 pts

People keep judging the likely outcome of this trial based on the evidence and the merit of the prosecution's work.

The Chauvin case showed that we're not that kind of country anymore. The corporate media and activist organizations are as much factors in the verdict as anything else. Those jurors lived in a world of constant propaganda and fear before being selected for jury duty.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, they could shit up the case and the brainwashed jurors might still find him guilty. That would demoralize people even more.

[–] • 1 pt

As someone said they have a weak as fuck case.

However, they also know that he’ll be convicted because it a political case and the Judge and Jury are contaminated. If not by politics, at least their own fear of lefties.

So why would they bother to build a strong case?

[–] • 1 pt

They don't hire on merit. Incompetence around a weak case is the most likely reason unless you have evidence to the contrary.

[–] • 1 pt

His prosecutors definitely dont seem too gung ho about it lol

[–] • 1 pt

Keep in mind that the prosecutor in court may or may not agree with the decision to prosecute. He doesn't get to make that choice. That choice is made by the DA. This guy gets assigned to the case and has to prosecute it whether he agrees with it or not. Like every job in the world, if your boss pisses you off there are ways to sabotage your boss in a way that is difficult or impossible to prove so you can't get in trouble for it.

[–] • 1 pt

They know the fix is in.