Well you did try. Because I am not an unfair judge, I will proceed to explain what and who I think you are, and why. > If even a few % outside of traditional death rates happen it will be disastrous for the US. No one who knows anything would deny that disaster in the short term is absolutely necessary for the the u.s. to survive in the long term. While opinions about the jab vary, some thinking it will eliminate the left, others that it will be forced on all of us (it will), no one I've talked to has not wished for the occupation to fall. It has always been "well at least the federal government will crash." This says to me that you don't want them to. Which means either you're ignorant that if the occupation government continues, america itself, as both a nation and an idea, will be destroyed--or you rely on them for a pension and paycheck. > 5 So you would appear emotional about this. If you were a federal contractor or some form of NGO glowie in five eyes, then this would naturally be your response. It is also the response of many other sincere people. But thats the test in the question isn't it? It boils down to, *can we disambiguate what your intentions are from how you answers?* In short, no, we can't. Its a "hes either *possibly* a bad faith actor, or hes *definitively* not". And because you're not *definitive*, we have to rule you're in the *possibly* bad faith camp. In other words I don't think you're real. Add to that that Kyle's case is obviously the beginning of a racial-conflict power-grab distraction narrative, and you pushing it now, when all the shills are also making it explicitly racial, says to me you're suspect or else you don't know how to think strategically. And therefore hether or not you're sincere, we are forced to treat you as insincere. VERDICT: Suspect possibly sucks cocks and may or may not be from a foreign country in the middle east. JUDGEMENT: Straight-camp in Utah and/or deportation. Do not pass go. Do not collect two hundred ~~pesos.~~ ~~shekels~~ quid.