The way I see it is the ones "on the other side" have issues getting to a receptive state. What I can offer people isn't really in line with prerequisite stations of their unfolding comprehension. People like Rogan or Peterson are, without doubt, better at getting through to those people. I'm better at peeling back deeper layers and the vast majority probably aren't receptive to the dismissive crowds, who the kinds of ecelebs I mentioned are better at grappling with. Therefore, I see people like Rogan/Peterson as the gatherers of normies, who beat them in to submission, until they *begin* to think. My role isn't getting them there. Mine is a deeper reduction, after they're more receptive to truths. I can't offer them what the likes of Tim can. My role is more about helping them to challenge what they know, not beginning the process of deeper thought. Susceptibility > Agency > Logos