A strong counter argument is that inactivated vaccines do not usually induce a significant immune response so they are frequently ineffective. But you're right, safety should be a very important consideration when making choices about your health. No matter what you choose you are in some way rolling the dice. Questioning everything and making your own informed decisions is the best path, anyone that withholds information or shuts down discussion should not be trusted.
Yea I guess I was thinking that way because the mRNA effectiveness is down to virtually nothing. They keep saying it staves off hospitalization but they are using numbers for really old fragile people, they're not differentiating when they make these statements, its a way to lie while not legally lying. I think initially they put sinovac in the 60% range of effectiveness which is worse than they initially reported for mRNA but sinovac may keep that effectiveness across variants because it contains the whole virus and thus all of the proteins for your body to make antibodies against. Also you don't produce the mass spike protein which seems to be damaging people. None of this matters to me because I already had covid though lol. Although I will say I am fighting this as much as I can but eventually to travel you might need this shit and I think inactivated virus is much safer tech. I really hope novavax is approved in the US. It is an inactivated virus vaccine and should be safe.
(post is archived)