Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

500

They're a work-from-home call center rep. It pays well because they're multi-lingual. Never been in an office or even seen their supervisor except via video call. They tried for a religious exemption but was auto-denied because "they didn't express a sincere belief," and there's no appeal. It's get the vax or get fired with prejudice.

They don't see anyone other than their own family. No office even exists.

Has anyone else experienced this yet, and what did you do?

They're a work-from-home call center rep. It pays well because they're multi-lingual. Never been in an office or even seen their supervisor except via video call. They tried for a religious exemption but was auto-denied because "they didn't express a sincere belief," and there's no appeal. It's get the vax or get fired with prejudice. They don't see anyone other than their own family. No office even exists. Has anyone else experienced this yet, and what did you do?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (149).
[–] • 27 pts 3y

sue, never need to work again

[–] • 17 pts 3y

My only advice to the guy was you're entering lawyer territory.

[–] • 12 pts 3y

Right- because all of the lawyers are just chomping at the bit to help workers?

I've been wondering, all through this covid hysteria- WHY ARE LAWYERS NO LONGER LITIGIOUS?! There could literally be a 350 million citizen class-action lawsuit against the US government for a HUGE VARIETY of crimes/wrongdoings/violations.

But they are not going to take cases like this. People are going to be terminated for either "insubordination" or "without reason". In these cases, a lawyer would have to prove that you were not insubordinate, or prove that the reason you were terminated was "because shot refused". And even then, most states have "Right to Work" laws, which essentially means an employer can terminate anybody at any time, with "no reason given". You've signed a document acknowledging that you understand this if you've ever worked in such a state. This leaves you with ZERO RECOURSE when terminated in this manner.

[+] [deleted] • 6 pts 3y
[–] • 4 pts 3y

>WHY ARE LAWYERS NO LONGER LITIGIOUS?!

Because they still have to deal with the Jewdiciary, which now decides it gets to play daddy government for everyone.

Until a few judges swing from trees, this trend will continue to get worse for everyone.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts 3y

Well since employers are now granting themselves permission to play doctor.

I am now a lawyer.

Feel free to ask me for advice.

[–] • 0 pt 3y

@AOUlooks like you have to give another happy merchant badge here

“until a few judges swing from trees”

Literally what I said about politicians.

Let’s go hypocrite, well?

[–] • 1 pt 3y

the law associations have been overtaken by pilpul

[–] • 1 pt 3y

The short of that is almost no judge or lawyer will touch this kind of case right now.

[–] • 1 pt 3y

sue against jewish lawyers with a jewish judge ruling in the jewish courts?

surely that will work.