Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

865
Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was. What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was.

What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

1 hour of daily exercise.
Limit/ban access to junk/fast food.
Weekly fasting.
A mix of all of the above.
Send fat people to camps, lol.
Experimental mRNA gene therapy juice.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (29).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I voted for camps but the realistic option is to ban junk food. Anything above a certain amount of sugar is banned. Or restrict sales to above 21, add warnings to the label like cigarettes. Mandatory exercise won’t help bc you can’t outrun a bad diet.

[–] • 0 pt

Because banning works so well on alcohol, drugs, and guns, right?

How about government gets the fuck out of our lives and concentrates on blowing up brown people on the other side of the globe like God intended