Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K
Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was. What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was.

What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

1 hour of daily exercise.
Limit/ban access to junk/fast food.
Weekly fasting.
A mix of all of the above.
Send fat people to camps, lol.
Experimental mRNA gene therapy juice.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (29).
[–] • 1 pt

It was a "choose one if you had to" scenario.

That only applies to the natural world where you cannot change some things. Mandates are not part of the natural world and there is always an option to defy them. Changing such a thing may not be easy, but it's not impossible. This is what our forefathers instructed us to do in the case of tyranny imposing such things. If you accept these mandates as impossible to change, then you do not deserve freedom. Accepting them without question is worse than acting as a child. At least children rebel when they don't like something arbitrarily decided by someone else.

[–] • 0 pt

Your inability to just accept a hypothetical scenario and pitching a fit as if any of us would truly support any of these mandates is childish and fucking retarded. Just answer the question and stop being a cunt.

[–] • 0 pt

What authority do you have over me to force me to answer this retarded hypothetical scenario? Where does that authority derive from? You have no such authority, but if you want to play like you can force me to answer, then here's a "no other option" hypothetical mandate scenario for you:

This is completely unavoidable so would you rather be mandated to:

A) suck a nigger's dick

B) let a nigger fuck you in the ass

C) suck two nigger dicks

D) all of the above

According to your rules, you have to pick one option and you can't choose to opt out. See how retarded this is? Now quit whining like a child about a hypothetical scenario that has no bearing on reality. It's okay to be nonconformist. You don't have to suck the conformist cock if you choose not to.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That is tough. Man. I guess A is potentially the least horrible option... rough one.

See was that so hard?

Edit* oh god i hope its not hard. I accidentally made the hypothetical worse. Here i am still ok. Like an adult.